Gestational Weight Gain in African Women: Guidelines, Realities, and Health Outcomes

Introduction to Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) as a Cornerstone of Prenatal Health

Gestational weight gain (GWG), defined as the total weight increase from conception until just before delivery, is a fundamental indicator of maternal and fetal well-being during pregnancy.¹ It is a powerful and potentially modifiable risk factor that influences a wide spectrum of health outcomes for both the mother and the infant.² Far from being a simple metric, GWG serves as a vital sign of the underlying maternal-fetal nutritional status, reflecting the complex interplay of dietary intake, metabolic changes, and the physiological demands of creating a new life.

The weight gained during pregnancy is not monolithic; it is a composite of several key components, each essential for a successful pregnancy. A typical weight gain of approximately 12.5 kg (27.6 lbs) in a woman with a normal pre-pregnancy weight is distributed among various tissues and fluids. The products of conception account for a significant portion, with the fetus typically weighing around 3.4 kg (7.5 lbs), the placenta 0.65 kg (1.4 lbs), and the amniotic fluid 0.8 kg (1.8 lbs) at term.⁴ The remaining gain supports the mother’s body in adapting to pregnancy, comprising growth of the uterus (1.4 kg or 3.0 lbs), increased blood volume (1.45 kg or 3.2 lbs), expanded fluid volume (1.5 kg or 3.3 lbs), and the accumulation of essential maternal fat stores (3.35 kg or 7.4 lbs).⁴ These fat stores are not superfluous; they are a critical energy reserve for the demanding periods of late pregnancy and lactation.⁷ Understanding this physiological breakdown is crucial for appreciating why adequate weight gain is not merely desirable but biologically necessary.

Optimizing GWG represents a unique opportunity to interrupt the intergenerational cycle of malnutrition and chronic disease. The nutritional environment in utero has profound and lasting effects on an individual’s health trajectory. Inadequate GWG is a primary cause of low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) infants, which are, in turn, major risk factors for neonatal mortality and childhood stunting.⁸ A female infant born with LBW is more likely to experience stunted growth during her own childhood and adolescence. If she enters pregnancy as a stunted, undernourished woman, she faces a higher risk of obstructed labor and is more likely to give birth to an LBW infant herself, thus perpetuating a vicious cycle across generations. Conversely, excessive GWG is strongly linked to fetal macrosomia (high birth weight) and an elevated risk of the child developing overweight or obesity later in life.³ These children are then predisposed to becoming obese adults with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, managing GWG is not simply a short-term prenatal task but a powerful public health intervention with the potential to improve health outcomes for generations to come.

The Unique Context of Maternal Nutrition in Africa: The Dual Burden

The nutritional landscape for women of childbearing age across the African continent is characterized by a complex and challenging “dual burden” of malnutrition. This paradox involves the simultaneous persistence of undernutrition and the rapid emergence of overweight and obesity, often within the same communities or even households. This duality complicates public health messaging and requires a nuanced approach to maternal health policy that can address both ends of the nutritional spectrum.

On one hand, undernutrition remains a deeply entrenched public health crisis. A significant proportion of women in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) enter pregnancy already underweight, and the average GWG across the region is alarmingly low.¹⁴ Research based on extensive demographic and health survey data reveals that the average total weight gain during pregnancy in SSA is approximately 6.6 kg, a figure that has shown no meaningful improvement over the past two decades.¹⁵ This widespread inadequate GWG is a primary driver of the region’s high rates of LBW, preterm birth, and associated maternal and infant mortality.⁸

On the other hand, the continent is undergoing a rapid nutrition transition, leading to a rising prevalence of overweight and obesity. This trend is particularly pronounced in urban areas and among women of the African diaspora, such as African American women, who exhibit high rates of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity.¹² Over 75% of African American women of reproductive age are classified as overweight or obese, placing them at a heightened risk for excessive GWG and its associated complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, and long-term postpartum weight retention.¹² This emerging epidemic of obesity coexists with the persistent problem of undernutrition, creating a formidable challenge for healthcare systems that must be equipped to counsel and manage women across the entire body mass index (BMI) spectrum.

International Benchmarks for Gestational Weight Gain

To provide a framework for optimal maternal and infant outcomes, several international health organizations have established evidence-based guidelines for GWG. The most widely adopted of these are the 2009 recommendations from the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). These guidelines, which are supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), have become the de facto global standard and are foundational to understanding the goals of prenatal weight management.²

The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) Guidelines for Singleton Pregnancies

The cornerstone of the IOM guidelines is the stratification of recommended weight gain based on a woman’s pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters ($kg/m^2$).⁶ This approach acknowledges that a woman’s baseline nutritional status is the most critical determinant of how much weight she needs to gain to support a healthy pregnancy. The guidelines provide a specific range of total weight gain for four distinct BMI categories, as detailed in Table 2.1. These ranges represent the patterns of weight gain associated with the lowest risk of adverse outcomes for both mother and child in the populations studied.²⁵

Trimester-Specific Analysis: Rate of Gain and Caloric Needs

The IOM guidelines recognize that GWG is not a linear process but follows a dynamic pattern across the three trimesters, corresponding to the different phases of fetal and maternal physiological changes.

First Trimester (Weeks 1-13): During the first three months of pregnancy, fetal growth is minimal, and the primary changes are hormonal and preparatory. Consequently, weight gain should be modest. The guidelines assume a total gain of only 0.5 to 2 kg (1.1 to 4.4 lbs) during this entire period.² For most women, particularly those starting at a healthy weight or higher, no additional caloric intake is necessary.²⁴ This is a critical point of counsel to counteract the pervasive and misleading cultural myth of “eating for two” from the onset of pregnancy.

Second and Third Trimesters (Weeks 14-40): This period is characterized by accelerated fetal growth and significant expansion of maternal tissues and fluids. To support this rapid development, a steady and consistent rate of weight gain is recommended. The ideal weekly rate of gain varies by pre-pregnancy BMI, with women who start at a lower BMI needing to gain more rapidly than those who start at a higher BMI.² This differential rate is designed to ensure the fetus receives adequate nutrition while minimizing the risk of excessive maternal fat storage.

To meet the energy demands of this phase, a moderate increase in daily caloric intake is required. The general recommendation is an additional 340 calories per day during the second trimester and an additional 450 calories per day during the third trimester, relative to pre-pregnancy needs.² These extra calories should be sourced from nutrient-dense foods to support both maternal health and fetal development.

Table 2.1: IOM/ACOG Recommended Gestational Weight Gain for Singleton Pregnancies

Pre-pregnancy BMI Category (kg/m2)	Total Weight Gain Range (kg)	Total Weight Gain Range (lbs)	Recommended Rate of Gain in 2nd & 3rd Trimesters (kg/week)	Recommended Rate of Gain in 2nd & 3rd Trimesters (lbs/week)
Underweight ($<18.5$)	12.5–18.0	28–40	0.44–0.58	1.0–1.3
Normal weight (18.5–24.9)	11.5–16.0	25–35	0.35–0.50	0.8–1.0
Overweight (25.0–29.9)	7.0–11.5	15–25	0.23–0.33	0.5–0.7
Obese ($\geq30.0$)	5.0–9.0	11–20	0.17–0.27	0.4–0.6

Sources: ²

Provisional Guidelines for Twin Pregnancies

Pregnancies with multiple gestations place substantially higher physiological and nutritional demands on the mother. Recognizing this, the IOM developed separate, provisional guidelines for women carrying twins, which recommend a significantly greater total weight gain to support the growth of two fetuses and associated tissues.²¹ These recommendations are also stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI, as shown in Table 2.2.

For twin pregnancies, early and substantial weight gain is particularly critical. Research suggests that gaining approximately 11 kg (24 lbs) by the 24th week of gestation can significantly reduce the risk of preterm labor, a common complication in multiple gestations.²⁹ To support this accelerated gain, the daily caloric requirement is also higher, with an estimated need for an additional 600 calories per day over pre-pregnancy levels.³⁰

Table 2.2: IOM Provisional Guidelines for Gestational Weight Gain in Twin Pregnancies

Pre-pregnancy BMI Category (kg/m2)	Total Weight Gain Range (kg)	Total Weight Gain Range (lbs)
Underweight ($<18.5$)	50–62 (Provisional data)	22.7–28.1 (Provisional data)
Normal weight (18.5–24.9)	37–54	16.8–24.5
Overweight (25.0–29.9)	31–50	14.1–22.7
Obese ($\geq30.0$)	25–42	11.4–19.1

Sources: ⁶

It is essential to interpret these international guidelines not as rigid, prescriptive targets but as valuable clinical tools for risk assessment. The provision of ranges rather than single-point targets acknowledges the natural biological variability among individuals.²⁴ The primary purpose of these guidelines is to identify the patterns of weight gain that are most strongly associated with positive maternal and fetal outcomes, such as a reduced risk of SGA, LGA, and cesarean delivery.²⁵ Therefore, when a woman’s weight gain trends outside the recommended range, it should not be viewed as a failure but rather as a crucial clinical signal. This signal should prompt a constructive conversation between the provider and the expectant mother, leading to an assessment of diet and physical activity, and the development of an individualized care plan.² This nuanced application transforms the guidelines from a simple monitoring chart into a dynamic instrument for promoting healthier pregnancies.

The Reality of Gestational Weight Gain in Sub-Saharan Africa

While the IOM guidelines provide a clear benchmark for optimal GWG, the reality for a vast majority of women in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is starkly different. Extensive research reveals a profound and persistent gap between these international recommendations and the observed weight gain patterns on the continent, highlighting a major, unresolved public health challenge rooted in undernutrition.

A Profound Gap: Observed GWG vs. International Recommendations

The most striking finding from large-scale analyses of demographic and health data across numerous SSA countries is the extremely low average total GWG. The mean weight gain over the course of a full-term pregnancy in SSA is estimated to be only 6.6 kg (95% CI: 6.0–7.2 kg).¹⁴

To put this figure in perspective, it is approximately half of the minimum recommended gain of 11.5 kg for a woman who begins her pregnancy at a normal, healthy weight.¹⁵ In fact, the average gain of 6.6 kg falls below the entire recommended range even for women classified as overweight (7.0–11.5 kg) and sits at the lower end of the range for women with obesity (5.0–9.0 kg).²⁴ This indicates a widespread, chronic energy deficit during pregnancy that affects women across the nutritional spectrum but is particularly severe for those who are already underweight or of normal weight at conception.

Trimester-by-Trimester Realities in SSA

When the total average gain is broken down by trimester, the pattern of nutritional deficit becomes even clearer. The trajectory of weight gain in SSA deviates significantly from the ideal curve recommended by the IOM.

• First Trimester: Studies observe “no meaningful gain” during this period.¹⁵ While this aligns with the IOM’s recommendation for minimal gain, in the context of widespread food insecurity, it may reflect an inability to meet basic nutritional needs rather than a healthy, stable start to pregnancy.
• Second and Third Trimesters: During the critical phases of rapid fetal growth, the average weight gain is approximately 2.2 kg in the second trimester and 3.2 kg in the third.¹⁵ This equates to a weekly gain of roughly 0.17 kg and 0.25 kg, respectively—far below the recommended rate of approximately 0.42 kg per week for a normal-weight woman. This slow rate of gain points to a sustained inadequacy of nutrient and energy intake precisely when the fetus’s demands are at their peak.

The data reveal that in the context of SSA, inadequate GWG is not an occasional deviation from an otherwise healthy norm; it is the prevailing standard for a majority of pregnancies. This reality has significant implications for public health strategy. Interventions that are individually targeted, assuming that inadequate gain is an exceptional case requiring specific clinical management, are likely to be insufficient. The scale of the problem suggests that broader, population-level interventions—such as improving household food security, implementing widespread micronutrient supplementation programs, and strengthening general nutrition education—are essential to shift the entire population distribution toward healthier weight gain patterns. Furthermore, this reality challenges the clinical utility of the IOM guidelines for risk stratification in these settings. If the vast majority of the pregnant population falls into the “high-risk” category of inadequate gain, the guidelines lose their ability to help clinicians discriminate and prioritize care for those most in need, potentially overwhelming already resource-constrained health systems.

Table 3.1: Comparative Analysis of IOM Recommendations vs. Observed GWG in Sub-Saharan Africa (for a Normal BMI Woman)

Parameter	IOM Recommendation (kg)	Observed SSA Average (kg)	Discrepancy (kg)
First Trimester Gain	0.5–2.0	~0.0	-0.5 to -2.0
Second Trimester Gain	~5.5	~2.2	-3.3
Third Trimester Gain	~5.5	~3.2	-2.3
Total GWG	11.5–16.0	~6.6	-4.9 to -9.4

Sources: ¹⁵

Disparities Within the Continent: The Influence of Geography, Education, and Wealth

The continental average of 6.6 kg masks significant heterogeneity within Africa, where GWG is deeply stratified by geography and socioeconomic status. These disparities underscore that maternal nutrition is not solely a biological issue but is profoundly shaped by the social, economic, and environmental context in which women live.

• Geographic Variation: There are notable differences in GWG across sub-regions. Weight gain is highest in Southern Africa, with an average of approximately 10.5 kg, and lowest in Western Africa, where the average is only 5.8 kg.¹⁵ These variations likely reflect differences in agricultural productivity, food systems, economic development, and cultural dietary patterns.
• Socioeconomic Gradient: A clear and consistent gradient exists linking GWG to both education and wealth.

• Education: Women with a secondary or higher education gain an average of 9.5 kg, nearly double the 5.0 kg gained by women with little or no formal education.¹⁵ This highlights the role of health literacy, empowerment, and improved economic opportunities that come with education.
• Wealth: Similarly, women from the richest household quintile gain an average of 9.0 kg, significantly more than the 6.1 kg gained by women in the poorest quintile.¹⁵ This demonstrates the direct impact of purchasing power on the ability to access a sufficient and diverse diet during pregnancy.

Health Sequelae of Suboptimal Gestational Weight Gain

The profound gap between recommended and actual gestational weight gain in many African contexts has severe and far-reaching consequences for the health of both mothers and their children. Suboptimal GWG, whether inadequate or excessive, is a major contributor to a wide range of adverse outcomes, from immediate perinatal complications to long-term chronic diseases.

The Pervasive Impact of Inadequate GWG

The widespread pattern of low GWG observed across Sub-Saharan Africa is directly linked to the region’s disproportionately high burden of adverse birth outcomes. Insufficient maternal weight gain is a proxy for maternal and fetal undernutrition and is one of the strongest predictors of poor neonatal health.¹⁵

• Low Birth Weight (LBW), Small for Gestational Age (SGA), and Preterm Birth: A robust body of evidence demonstrates a strong, causal relationship between inadequate GWG and an increased risk of delivering infants who are born too small or too soon. Studies across SSA consistently show that women who gain less weight than recommended have significantly higher odds of having LBW ($<2500$ g), SGA (weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age), and preterm (born before 37 weeks) babies.¹ One multi-country analysis found that among underweight women, the risk of delivering an LBW infant increased by 70% for those with the lowest GWG.⁸ Another study found that women with inadequate GWG had more than double the odds of having an LBW baby compared to those with adequate gain.⁹
• Maternal and Perinatal Mortality: These adverse neonatal outcomes are not isolated events; they are the primary drivers of infant mortality. LBW and preterm birth are leading causes of death in the first month of life.¹⁰ Furthermore, the severe maternal undernutrition that leads to poor GWG can also increase the risk of direct maternal complications and mortality.¹⁵ Thus, addressing the challenge of inadequate GWG is central to efforts to reduce the unacceptably high rates of maternal and infant death in the region.

The Emerging Challenge of Excessive GWG

While undernutrition is the predominant problem in many parts of Africa, the concurrent rise of overweight and obesity means that the risks associated with excessive GWG are an increasing concern, particularly in urban centers and for women in the diaspora. Gaining more weight than recommended is associated with a distinct set of serious complications.

• Maternal Complications: Excessive GWG significantly increases a woman’s risk for several major obstetric complications. These include a higher likelihood of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, such as preeclampsia.³⁶ Women who gain excessively are also more likely to require a cesarean delivery, which carries its own risks of surgical complications, infection, and longer recovery times.²⁶
• Neonatal Complications: For the infant, the primary risk of excessive maternal weight gain is being born too large. Excessive GWG is a strong predictor of fetal macrosomia (birth weight $>4000$ g or 4500 g) and delivering an infant who is large for gestational age (LGA).¹¹ Macrosomia increases the risk of birth complications, such as shoulder dystocia (where the baby’s shoulder gets stuck during delivery), which can lead to birth injuries for the infant and trauma for the mother.
• Long-Term Consequences: The health impacts of excessive GWG extend far beyond delivery.

• For the Mother: It is one of the strongest predictors of postpartum weight retention.²¹ Women who gain too much weight during pregnancy often struggle to lose it afterward, which can lead to a higher starting BMI in subsequent pregnancies and an increased lifetime risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.⁴
• For the Child: Excessive GWG contributes to the intergenerational cycle of obesity. An infant exposed to an in-utero environment of caloric excess is more likely to be born large and has a significantly higher risk of developing overweight or obesity during childhood and adolescence, perpetuating the cycle of chronic disease into the next generation.¹²

The timing of weight gain may also have differential effects on outcomes, and these effects could vary by ethnicity. While most guidelines emphasize the rate of gain in the second and third trimesters, some research indicates that weight gain in the first trimester is independently associated with risks like GDM.³⁸ Furthermore, one study focusing on African-American women found that infant birth weight was more strongly correlated with maternal weight gain in the first half of pregnancy. In contrast, for non-African-American women, the stronger association was with weight gain in the second half of pregnancy.⁴¹ This suggests that for women of African descent, ensuring adequate nutrition and a healthy pattern of weight gain from the very earliest stages of pregnancy may be disproportionately important for optimal fetal growth, a finding with significant implications for the timing of antenatal care and nutritional counseling.

Table 4.1: Maternal and Neonatal Risks Associated with Inadequate and Excessive GWG

Risk Category	Risks of Inadequate GWG	Risks of Excessive GWG
Maternal (Short-Term)	– Increased risk of maternal undernutrition and mortality	– Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) – Hypertensive disorders (preeclampsia) – Increased likelihood of cesarean delivery
Maternal (Long-Term)	– Potential for continued nutritional depletion	– Postpartum weight retention – Increased risk of long-term obesity – Higher risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Neonatal (Short-Term)	– Low Birth Weight (LBW) – Small for Gestational Age (SGA) – Preterm birth – Increased risk of perinatal mortality	– Fetal macrosomia (high birth weight) – Large for Gestational Age (LGA) – Birth complications (e.g., shoulder dystocia)
Offspring (Long-Term)	– Increased risk of childhood stunting and developmental delays	– Increased risk of childhood and adult overweight/obesity – Higher risk of metabolic syndrome in later life

Sources: ⁸

Determinants of Maternal Nutrition and Weight Gain in African Contexts

The patterns of gestational weight gain observed across Africa are not random; they are the outcome of a complex interplay of deep-rooted socioeconomic, cultural, and healthcare system factors. Understanding these determinants is essential for designing effective interventions that go beyond simple dietary advice to address the underlying drivers of maternal malnutrition.

Socioeconomic Drivers

Socioeconomic status is arguably the most powerful determinant of a woman’s nutritional health during pregnancy. Poverty and its associated deprivations create formidable barriers to achieving adequate GWG.

• Poverty and Food Insecurity: The most direct driver of inadequate GWG is the inability to afford a sufficient quantity and quality of food. In many parts of Kenya and SSA, low household income and food insecurity mean that pregnant women cannot purchase the diverse, nutrient-rich diet required to meet their increased needs.⁴² One study at a major Kenyan maternity hospital found that 63% of mothers cited lack of money as the primary reason for not eating an adequate diet.⁴⁴
• Maternal Education: A woman’s level of education is strongly and positively correlated with her GWG. Women with secondary or higher education consistently gain more weight than those with little or no formal schooling.¹⁵ This association works through several pathways: education improves health literacy and nutritional knowledge, enhances a woman’s autonomy and decision-making power within the household, and typically leads to better employment opportunities and higher income.

Cultural and Social Influences

Beyond economic constraints, a rich and complex web of cultural beliefs, social norms, and dietary traditions profoundly shapes what a pregnant woman eats. These influences can sometimes conflict with modern nutritional recommendations.

• Dietary Taboos and Beliefs: Across various communities in Kenya and elsewhere, specific food taboos during pregnancy are common. Often, these restrictions apply to highly nutritious, protein-rich foods. For example, some cultures restrict the consumption of eggs and certain meats, believing they will cause the baby to grow too large, leading to a difficult and dangerous delivery.⁴⁷ At the same time, other less nutritious foods like ugali or porridge may be encouraged for strength. These beliefs, while culturally significant, can inadvertently lead to a diet deficient in essential proteins, fats, and micronutrients.
• Social Norms and Perceptions: The advice and influence of family and community members are powerful forces. The pervasive myth of “eating for two” can encourage overconsumption and excessive weight gain, particularly in more affluent settings or among women in the diaspora.⁴⁹ Conversely, in food-insecure households, social hierarchies may mean the pregnant woman does not get priority access to available food. For women of African heritage living in high-income countries, a cultural acceptance of larger body sizes may lead to a rejection of clinical advice about the risks of obesity and the need for weight management.¹²

Healthcare System Factors

The healthcare system plays a pivotal role as the primary interface for delivering nutritional guidance and monitoring during pregnancy. The accessibility and quality of this care are critical determinants of GWG outcomes.

• Antenatal Care (ANC) Access and Quality: The frequency of ANC attendance is a significant predictor of adequate GWG. Studies in Ethiopia show that women who attend four or more ANC visits are nearly three to six times more likely to gain adequate weight compared to those with fewer visits.⁵¹ More frequent contact with the health system provides repeated opportunities for weight monitoring, personalized counseling, and the provision of essential supplements like iron and folic acid. However, access to and retention in ANC care remains a challenge in many parts of the continent.²⁰
• Provider Practices and Counseling: The effectiveness of ANC depends heavily on the actions of healthcare providers. While national policies in countries like Kenya mandate the screening of GWG, the implementation of effective management and counseling strategies can be inconsistent.⁵³ Providers may lack specific training in nutrition counseling, feel unconfident discussing the sensitive topic of weight, or be constrained by time and a lack of clear, practical guidelines.⁵⁶

Critically, there is often a disconnect between a woman’s motivation to have a healthy pregnancy and her ability to implement healthy behaviors, a gap driven by these structural barriers. Many studies, including those with African American women, show that pregnant women are highly motivated to eat well and exercise for the health of their unborn child.¹² However, this intrinsic motivation is frequently undermined by powerful external realities. A woman may know the importance of a balanced diet but be unable to afford it due to poverty.⁴⁴ She may wish to be more physically active but be constrained by living in an unsafe neighborhood.¹² She may receive sound advice from a clinician but face overwhelming pressure from her family to adhere to traditional dietary norms.⁴⁸ This demonstrates that interventions focused solely on providing information are destined to fail if they do not concurrently address the socioeconomic, environmental, and cultural barriers that prevent women from translating knowledge into sustained practice. A multi-level, socio-ecological approach that empowers women while also transforming their environments is therefore essential.

Bridging the Gap: Adapting Guidelines for Clinical Practice in Africa

The widespread use of the IOM guidelines as a global benchmark raises a critical question: how appropriate and applicable are these standards for the diverse populations of women across the African continent? A careful appraisal reveals significant limitations and highlights an urgent need for more contextually relevant tools and clinical approaches.

Critical Appraisal of IOM Guidelines for African Populations

The 2009 IOM guidelines represent a landmark in evidence-based prenatal care, but their development was based almost exclusively on observational studies conducted in high-income countries, primarily the United States and Western Europe.⁵⁸ They were not designed for, nor have they been validated in, the diverse settings of Sub-Saharan Africa, where the underlying realities of maternal health—including a high prevalence of pre-pregnancy underweight, infectious diseases like malaria and HIV, and chronic food insecurity—are vastly different.¹⁵

A significant indicator of this evidence gap is the evolution of recommendations regarding ethnicity. The 1990 IOM guidelines included a specific recommendation for Black women to aim for the upper end of their respective weight gain ranges. However, this recommendation was removed in the 2009 revision, with the committee citing “inadequate evidence” to support a race-specific guideline.⁴⁰ While intended to be evidence-driven, this removal left a void, effectively defaulting to a “one-size-fits-all” model that does not account for potential differences in body composition, metabolism, or risk profiles among women of African descent. This lack of specific guidance is not merely a data gap; it is a health equity issue. When clinical standards are derived from and centered on the health experiences of populations in high-income countries, the unique physiological and environmental realities of women in SSA are treated as deviations from the norm rather than distinct contexts requiring their own evidence base. This can lead to the application of inappropriate clinical advice and a misallocation of public health resources.

The Call for Global and Localized Standards

There is a growing international consensus that this gap must be addressed. The World Health Organization (WHO) has initiated a major project to develop global GWG standards that are designed to be applicable across all BMI levels and diverse geographic locations.⁵⁸ This initiative explicitly acknowledges that the IOM guidelines may not be suitable for all populations and represents a crucial step toward creating more equitable and effective tools for monitoring maternal nutrition worldwide. The development of such standards is not just a scientific exercise; it is a fundamental move toward global health standards that recognize and address the specific needs of the world’s most vulnerable mothers and infants. In parallel, there is a pressing need for research to develop and validate population-specific or regional GWG charts for Africa, as very few existing fetal growth or maternal weight charts are based on data from African populations.⁶¹

Practical Guidance for Healthcare Providers in Resource-Constrained Settings

While the development of new global and regional standards is underway, healthcare providers on the ground need practical, actionable guidance for the present. In the absence of validated, context-specific charts, clinicians can adapt their approach to use existing tools wisely and incorporate simple, effective methods into routine care.

• Monitor Consistently: The first step is consistent monitoring. As recommended in Kenyan national guidelines, a woman’s weight should be measured and recorded at every antenatal care visit.⁵³ This creates a trajectory that allows for the early identification of poor or excessive gain. In settings where reliable scales are unavailable or pre-pregnancy weight is unknown, measuring the Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) is a simple, low-cost, and effective alternative for screening for undernutrition. A MUAC of less than 23 cm indicates a significant nutritional risk and should trigger immediate counseling and support.⁵³
• Counsel with Cultural Sensitivity: Nutritional advice must be practical, affordable, and culturally appropriate. Rather than prescribing diets based on foreign food patterns, counseling should focus on optimizing the local diet. This involves identifying locally available, nutrient-dense foods (e.g., dark green leafy vegetables, legumes, small fish like omena, and fruits) and working with women to incorporate them more frequently into their meals.⁶² It also requires respectfully addressing cultural food taboos, explaining their potential nutritional consequences, and suggesting acceptable alternatives.
• Use Existing Guidelines as a Framework, Not a Rule: The IOM guidelines can still serve as a useful starting point for risk assessment and for initiating conversations about nutrition. The primary clinical goal in an under-resourced setting should be to prevent grossly inadequate weight gain (e.g., a total gain of less than 5–7 kg), which is consistently associated with the most severe adverse outcomes like LBW and preterm birth. The guidelines can help frame discussions about the importance of steady gain in the second and third trimesters and provide a visual tool to help women understand their progress.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

Synthesis of Key Findings

This report has illuminated the critical importance of gestational weight gain as a determinant of maternal and child health in African populations. The analysis reveals a stark and persistent chasm between the internationally recommended guidelines for GWG and the lived reality for a majority of women in Sub-Saharan Africa, who experience widespread and dangerously inadequate weight gain. This chronic maternal undernutrition is a primary driver of the region’s high burden of low birth weight, preterm birth, and associated infant mortality, perpetuating an intergenerational cycle of poor health. Concurrently, an emerging epidemic of overweight, obesity, and excessive GWG, particularly in urban areas and the diaspora, presents a parallel challenge, increasing risks for gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery, and long-term obesity for both mother and child. The determinants of these patterns are multifactorial, rooted in deep socioeconomic disparities, shaped by cultural beliefs, and influenced by the accessibility and quality of healthcare. The current global guidelines, developed in high-income countries, lack validation and specificity for African populations, underscoring an urgent need for contextually relevant standards and interventions.

Recommendations for National Health Ministries and Policymakers

1. Develop and Integrate Clear National GWG Guidelines: National Ministries of Health should develop, adopt, and disseminate clear, simple, and actionable protocols for GWG monitoring and counseling within their national Antenatal Care (ANC) guidelines. These protocols, inspired by models like Kenya’s, should include specific weight gain charts or targets and provide action-oriented advice for healthcare providers to follow when a woman’s weight gain is off-track.⁵³
2. Strengthen Health System Capacity: Invest in comprehensive training programs for frontline healthcare workers (midwives, nurses, community health volunteers) on culturally competent nutrition counseling, the importance of GWG, and practical strategies for weight management.⁵⁶ Ensure that all facilities providing ANC are equipped with essential tools, including accurate scales and MUAC tapes.
3. Address Structural Determinants of Malnutrition: Implement multi-sectoral policies that address the root causes of maternal malnutrition. This includes programs to enhance household food security, promote female education and economic empowerment, and improve access to clean water and sanitation, as these factors are foundational to a woman’s ability to achieve a healthy pregnancy.⁴²

Recommendations for Clinical Practice

1. Screen, Monitor, and Counsel at Every Visit: Make weight measurement (or MUAC screening) a mandatory component of every ANC visit. Use a simple, visual chart to plot the woman’s weight gain over time, and use this chart as a tool to engage her in a conversation about her progress and nutritional needs.
2. Provide Individualized, Practical, and Culturally Sensitive Advice: Tailor dietary and lifestyle recommendations to each woman’s pre-pregnancy BMI, socioeconomic reality, and cultural background. Focus on small, achievable changes that utilize affordable, locally available, and culturally acceptable nutrient-dense foods.⁶²
3. Promote a Holistic Healthy Lifestyle: Counsel women on the benefits of safe and appropriate physical activity, such as brisk walking, during pregnancy.⁶⁶ Actively work to debunk the “eating for two” myth by providing clear guidance on the modest increase in caloric needs, emphasizing nutrient quality over sheer quantity.⁵⁹

Recommendations for Future Research

1. Develop and Validate Africa-Specific GWG Standards: Prioritize and provide funding for large-scale, multi-country, longitudinal cohort studies that follow women from pre-conception through the postpartum period. Such studies are essential to generate the robust data required to create evidence-based, region-specific GWG charts and guidelines that reflect the unique physiology and environment of African women.
2. Design and Evaluate Context-Appropriate Interventions: Conduct rigorous research to design and test the effectiveness of multi-level, culturally tailored interventions aimed at optimizing GWG. These interventions should move beyond simple education to address the complex socioeconomic, behavioral, and health system barriers identified in this report.
3. Investigate Ethnic and Genetic Influences: Conduct further research to explore potential differences in optimal GWG, body composition changes during pregnancy, and the association between GWG and health outcomes among various ethnic groups within Africa and the diaspora. This research is needed to determine whether more finely-tuned, population-specific recommendations are warranted.⁴⁰

Works cited

1. Influence of gestational weight gain on baby’s birth weight in Addis Ababa, Central Ethiopia: a follow-up study | BMJ Open, accessed October 17, 2025, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e055660
2. Gestational Weight Gain – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5701873/
3. Gestational Weight Gain as a Modifiable Risk Factor in Women with Extreme Pregestational BMI – MDPI, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/4/736
4. Gestational Weight Gain Among Women with Obesity.indd – National Academy of Medicine, accessed October 17, 2025, https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Gestational-Weight-Gain-Among-Women-with-Obesity.pdf
5. (PDF) Guidelines on how to monitor gestational weight gain during antenatal care, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369589202_Guidelines_on_how_to_monitor_gestational_weight_gain_during_antenatal_care
6. Pregnancy weight gain: What’s healthy? – Mayo Clinic, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/pregnancy-week-by-week/in-depth/pregnancy-weight-gain/art-20044360
7. Guidelines on how to monitor gestational weight gain during antenatal care: Number 2 – February 2023 – PMC, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10078888/
8. Association between gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes: cohort analysis from South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa | BMJ Public Health, accessed October 17, 2025, https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000900
9. Inadequate gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy …, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4402896/
10. Effect of antenatal care on low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis in Africa, 2022 – Frontiers, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1158809/full
11. ACOG Issues Guidelines on Fetal Macrosomia – AAFP, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2001/0701/p169.html
12. A Qualitative Study of Factors Affecting Pregnancy Weight Gain in …, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4284051/
13. Excess Weight and Weight Gain During Pregnancy – Brown University Health, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.brownhealth.org/centers-services/multidisciplinary-obstetric-medicine-service-moms/pregnancy-weight-gain
14. journals.plos.org, accessed October 17, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252247#:~:text=Estimated%20gestational%20weight%20gain%20in%20sub%2DSaharan%20Africa&text=GWG%20increased%20by%206.6%20kg,at%20the%20end%20of%20pregnancy.
15. Gestational weight gain in sub-Saharan Africa: Estimation based on pseudo-cohort design, accessed October 17, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252247
16. Prepregnancy body mass and weight gain during pregnancy in India and sub-Saharan Africa | PNAS, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1416964112
17. Gestational weight gain in sub-Saharan Africa: Estimation based on pseudo-cohort design – Semantic Scholar, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/515a/819e000ea1a9b299dd5e2ef8248aa8e13ab3.pdf
18. Gestational weight gain in sub-Saharan Africa: Estimation based on pseudo-cohort design, accessed October 17, 2025, https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0252247.html
19. Obesity and Excess Weight Gain During Pregnancy Linked to Heavier Babies in African-American Women | Boston University Medical Campus, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.bumc.bu.edu/2013/02/13/obesity-and-excess-weight-gain-during-pregnancy-linked-to-heavier-babies-in-african-american-women/
20. Prevalence and pregnant women´s knowledge of maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain among women attending antenatal care in Fako Division, Cameroon – Pan African Medical Journal, accessed October 17, 2025, https://panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/44/2/full/
21. New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obstetrician/gynecologists should know – PMC, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2847829/
22. Recommended Weight Gain and Obesity Management in Pregnancy – The ObG Project, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.obgproject.com/2016/11/17/recommended-weight-gain-obesity-management-pregnancy/
23. ACOG Offers Updated Guidelines on Weight Gain During Pregnancy – NEJM Journal Watch, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.jwatch.org/fw201212210000003/2012/12/21/acog-offers-updated-guidelines-weight-gain
24. Weight Gain During Pregnancy | Maternal Infant Health – CDC, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-infant-health/pregnancy-weight/index.html
25. How Much Weight Should I Gain During My Pregnancy? – Dr. Michael Polcino, MD, accessed October 17, 2025, https://dr-polcino.com/blog-weight-during-pregnancy.html
26. 2009 IOM guidelines for gestational weight gain: how well do they predict outcomes across ethnic groups? | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321053624_2009_IOM_guidelines_for_gestational_weight_gain_how_well_do_they_predict_outcomes_across_ethnic_groups
27. Table: Guidelines for Weight Gain During Pregnancy*-MSD Manual Professional Edition, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/multimedia/table/guidelines-for-weight-gain-during-pregnancy
28. Weight gain in twin gestations: Are the Institute of Medicine guidelines optimal for neonatal outcomes? – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4486049/
29. Weight Gain with Twins | American Pregnancy Association, accessed October 17, 2025, https://americanpregnancy.org/healthy-pregnancy/multiples/weight-gain-with-multiples/
30. Twin Pregnancy Obstetric Care Guidelines – Brigham and Women’s Hospital, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.brighamandwomens.org/obgyn/maternal-fetal-medicine/for-medical-professionals/twin-pregnancy-obstetric-care-guidelines
31. (PDF) The Effect of Race/Ethnicity on Gestational Weight Gain – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255735583_The_Effect_of_RaceEthnicity_on_Gestational_Weight_Gain
32. Gestational weight gain in sub-Saharan Africa: Estimation based on pseudo-cohort design, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8153429/
33. Gestational weight gain and its effect on birth outcomes in sub …, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7179909/
34. Gestational weight gain trajectories in sub-Saharan Africa – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Gestational-weight-gain-trajectories-in-sub-Saharan-Africa_fig1_351889326
35. Impact of Low Maternal Weight on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes – Oxford Academic, accessed October 17, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/jes/article/9/1/bvae206/7908155
36. Obesity in Pregnancy: ACOG Committee Opinion | AAFP, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2006/0415/p1471.html
37. Consequences of Gestational Weight Gain for the Mother – NCBI, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32818/
38. Gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study, accessed October 17, 2025, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e038187
39. Excess Weight Gain in Pregnancy Has Long Lasting Effects on Mom …, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/excess-weight-gain-in-pregnancy-has-long-lasting-e
40. Gestational Weight Gain of Pregnant African American Adolescents Affects Body Mass Index 18 Years Later – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3810949/
41. The effects of maternal weight gain patterns on term birth weight in African-American women, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45198492_The_effects_of_maternal_weight_gain_patterns_on_term_birth_weight_in_African-American_women
42. Determinants of Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women at Njoro Sub County Hospital, Nakuru County, Kenya, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jrssh/article/download/903/822
43. (PDF) Perceived Socio-Cultural and Economic Factors Influencing Maternal and Child Health: Qualitative Insights from Mwingi District, Kenya – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279980537_Perceived_Socio-Cultural_and_Economic_Factors_Influencing_Maternal_and_Child_Health_Qualitative_Insights_from_Mwingi_District_Kenya
44. Socio-cultural factors influencing nutritional status among women attending Pumwani Maternity Hospital, Nairobi – UoN Digital Repository Home, accessed October 17, 2025, https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/4078
45. Maternal nutrition in rural Kenya: health and socio-demographic determinants and its association with child nutrition – PubMed, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21624050/
46. Influence of Household Socio-Economic, Demographic, and Cultural Factors on Women’s Access to Maternal Healthcare in Malindi, accessed October 17, 2025, https://ajernet.net/ojs/index.php/ajernet/article/download/707/452
47. MATERNAL, INFANT, AND YOUNG CHILD NUTRITION IN KENYA, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.nutritionintl.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ENRICH-FR-Summary-report_Kenya_FINAL_print.pdf
48. Food beliefs and practices among the Kalenjin pregnant women in rural Uasin Gishu County, Kenya – PubMed Central, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5445501/
49. Factors Influencing Pregnancy and Postpartum Weight Management …, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7925838/
50. Factors Influencing Pregnancy and Postpartum Weight Management in Women of African and Caribbean Ancestry Living in High Income Countries: Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis Using a Behavioral Change Theoretical Model – Frontiers, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.637800/full
51. Gestational weight gain and its determinant factors among women attending at public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023 – PMC, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12409943/
52. (PDF) Gestational weight gain and its associated factors in Harari Regional State: Institution based cross-sectional study, Eastern Ethiopia – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307530644_Gestational_weight_gain_and_its_associated_factors_in_Harari_Regional_State_Institution_based_cross-sectional_study_Eastern_Ethiopia
53. National Guidelines for Quality Obstetrics and Perinatal Care, accessed October 17, 2025, http://guidelines.health.go.ke:8000/media/National_Guidelines_for_Quality_Obstetrics_and_Perinatal_Care.pdf
54. (PDF) Interdisciplinary Care Compliance with Antenatal Physical Activity and Exercises Guidelines for Management of Excessive Gestational Weight Gain for Prevention of Overweight and Obesity, Busia County, Kenya – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390952675_Interdisciplinary_Care_Compliance_with_Antenatal_Physical_Activity_and_Exercises_Guidelines_for_Management_of_Excessive_Gestational_Weight_Gain_for_Prevention_of_Overweight_and_Obesity_Busia_County_Ke
55. Interdisciplinary Care Compliance with Antenatal Physical Activity and Exercises Guidelines for Management of Excessive Gestational Weight Gain for Prevention of Overweight and Obesity, Busia County, Kenya – Consensus, accessed October 17, 2025, https://consensus.app/papers/interdisciplinary-care-compliance-with-antenatal-muia-okedi/946bbda1edcd557286bd7584de037594/
56. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perspectives about pregnancy related weight management in Ethiopia: A qualitative study | PLOS One – Research journals, accessed October 17, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244221
57. (PDF) Clinical guidelines for the management of weight during pregnancy: a qualitative evidence synthesis of practice recommendations across NHS Trusts in England – ResearchGate, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369172526_Clinical_guidelines_for_the_management_of_weight_during_pregnancy_a_qualitative_evidence_synthesis_of_practice_recommendations_across_NHS_Trusts_in_England
58. Development of Global gestational weight gain standards – Nutrition and Food Safety, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.who.int/teams/nutrition-and-food-safety/development-of-global-gestational-weight-gain-standards
59. The New Institute of Medicine Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines – Page 3 – Medscape, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/733438_3
60. GLOBAL GESTATIONAL WEIGHT GAIN STANDARDS PROJECT Final report – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed October 17, 2025, https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/nutrition-and-food-safety/technical-advisory-group-on-gestational-weight-gain/tag-gwg-annex3-study-level-eligibilitycriteria.pdf
61. Development of a Fetal Weight Chart Using Serial Trans-Abdominal Ultrasound in an East African Population: A Longitudinal Observational Study | PLOS One, accessed October 17, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0044773
62. Nutrition in Pregnancy | Infonet Biovision Home., accessed October 17, 2025, https://infonet-biovision.org/healthy-food/nutrition-pregnancy
63. Diet and Nutrition During Pregnancy – Jacaranda Maternity, accessed October 17, 2025, https://www.jacarandamaternity.co.ke/post/diet-and-nutrition-during-pregnancy
64. 3 kenya strategy for maternal, infant and young child nutrition 2023 …, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pathecd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/1-Kenya-Strategy-for-Maternal-Infant-and-Young-Child-Nutrition-2023-28.pdf
65. Kenya National Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Reference Manual, accessed October 17, 2025, http://guidelines.health.go.ke:8000/media/Kenya_National_Clinical_Nutrition_and_Dietetics_Reference_Manual_-_February_2010.pdf
66. Physical activities and cardiometabolic profiles of African overweight and obese pregnant women – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed October 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11823039/