Spotting Early Signs of Autism in Young Children

1. Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is recognized as a complex neurodevelopmental condition that significantly impacts an individual’s social interaction, communication, learning, and behavior.¹ It is fundamentally characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interaction, coupled with restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities.¹ While a diagnosis of ASD can occur at any point in life, it is categorized as a developmental disorder due to the typical onset of its symptoms within the first two years of life.¹ The term “spectrum” within ASD highlights the wide array of characteristics, varying needs, unique strengths, and diverse challenges observed among affected individuals.¹

The timely identification of ASD is of paramount importance for optimizing developmental trajectories. Early diagnosis is crucial because it facilitates prompt access to interventions and support, which have been consistently shown to significantly enhance a child’s communication and social skills.⁴ Research consistently demonstrates that interventions initiated early lead to more favorable developmental outcomes, encompassing improvements in cognitive abilities, language acquisition, and social engagement.⁴ The period of rapid brain development in early childhood, marked by heightened neuroplasticity, renders early intervention particularly impactful for a child’s long-term development and functional abilities.⁴ This emphasis on the brain’s rapid development and heightened neuroplasticity during early childhood suggests that early intervention is not merely beneficial but holds transformative potential. Interventions during this critical window can fundamentally alter developmental pathways, leading to more profound and lasting changes in brain function and skill acquisition compared to interventions initiated later in life. This perspective elevates early intervention from a helpful strategy to a critical, time-sensitive opportunity for achieving optimal developmental outcomes.

Furthermore, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends universal screening for ASD ¹, a recommendation that, when considered alongside the rising global prevalence rates of ASD ⁹, elevates early detection from an individual clinical concern to a significant public health priority. This viewpoint suggests that early ASD detection is a strategic public health endeavor. It aims to improve population-level health outcomes, reduce the societal burden associated with more intensive support needs in later life, and ensure equitable access to care. Such a comprehensive approach necessitates systemic strategies and resource allocation that extend beyond individual clinical encounters.

This paper aims to synthesize current scientific literature regarding the early indicators of ASD in young children, to articulate the profound benefits of early intervention, to detail the contemporary diagnostic process, and to explore the multifaceted challenges that impede timely diagnosis. The focus is specifically on children from infancy through preschool age (0-5 years).

2. Understanding Autism Spectrum Disorder

Autism Spectrum Disorder is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent and significant deficits in social communication and social interaction, coupled with restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities.¹ These core diagnostic features are consistently observed across individuals, irrespective of their race, ethnicity, culture, or socioeconomic status.¹¹ The symptoms of ASD can profoundly affect an individual’s capacity to function effectively in various life domains, including academic settings, employment, and daily living.¹

The term “spectrum” is integral to the disorder’s definition, signifying the broad range of characteristics, varying needs, unique strengths, and diverse challenges experienced by individuals with ASD.¹ The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), represents a significant shift in classification, consolidating previously distinct diagnoses—such as autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS)—into the single umbrella category of ASD.² This change was implemented to better capture the wide phenotypic variability of the condition. While core features are consistently present, individuals with ASD can differ significantly from one another, with certain features being more prominent in some cases than others.¹¹ For instance, some children with ASD may exhibit learning difficulties and lower-than-average intelligence, while others may possess typical to high intelligence, yet struggle profoundly with communication, applying their knowledge in everyday contexts, and adjusting to social situations.¹²

Globally, approximately 1 in 100 children are diagnosed with autism.¹⁰ In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated the prevalence of ASD to be about 1 in 59 children aged 8 years in 2016.² This figure subsequently increased to 1 in 36 children aged 8 years by 2020.⁹ Parent-reported ASD diagnoses in the U.S. averaged slightly higher at 2.5% in 2016.² The global incidence of ASD has been observed to increase annually, with predictive models forecasting continued rises in incidence, prevalence, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) from 2022 to 2046.⁹

ASD is known to occur across all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups.² However, the rate of diagnosis is not uniform across these groups. Historically, Caucasian children have been identified with ASD more frequently than Black or Hispanic children.² More recent U.S. data indicates that autism prevalence is lower among White children (2.7%) compared to Hispanic (3.3%), Black (3.7%), Asian or Pacific Islander (3.8%), and American Indian or Alaska Native (3.8%) children.¹⁰ There is also a notable gender disparity, with a significantly higher prevalence in boys than in girls (3.8-fold higher in 8-year-olds in 2020: 43.0 vs. 11.4 per 1,000 children).⁹ Regions with more advanced economies, such as California and New Jersey, tend to report higher rates of ASD, suggesting a correlation between prevalence and economic status.⁹ The scarcity of screening and diagnostic resources in underdeveloped regions may contribute to lower reported incidence rates in those areas.⁹

While ASD is universally present across all demographic groups ², the observed disparities in diagnosis rates by race/ethnicity ² and socioeconomic status ⁹ suggest that the “spectrum” is not equally visible or accessible to all populations. This indicates systemic biases in identification and access to care, rather than true differences in underlying prevalence. The DSM-5’s shift to a “spectrum” diagnosis ² was intended to be more inclusive. However, the consistent reporting of lower diagnosis rates among certain racial/ethnic minority groups and lower-income households ² contradicts the idea of uniform prevalence across all groups. If the disorder itself does not differ across these groups, then the diagnostic disparities must stem from external factors. These factors likely include limited access to culturally competent healthcare providers, a lack of awareness of autism signs within specific cultural contexts, and financial barriers to seeking evaluation, all contributing to delayed or missed diagnoses in these populations. This represents a critical equity issue that demands targeted interventions.

A significant observation is the apparent paradox between the rising global prevalence of ASD and the persistent underdiagnosis in certain regions. The global increase in ASD prevalence and incidence ⁹ appears to be a positive trend in terms of recognition. However, the simultaneous observation of lower reported rates in underdeveloped regions due to a “lack of screening, diagnostic resources, and early educational services” ⁹ reveals a significant paradox. This suggests that the rising global numbers may, in part, reflect improved awareness and diagnostic capacity in developed nations, rather than solely a true increase in the biological incidence of ASD. The data shows a clear upward trend in ASD prevalence globally.⁹ Yet, the same source attributes lower rates in certain regions to a lack of diagnostic infrastructure. This implies that the “increase” might not solely be an epidemiological phenomenon but also a reflection of improved detection capabilities in certain parts of the world. If diagnostic resources were equally available everywhere, the true global prevalence might be significantly higher than currently reported. This highlights that many children with ASD, particularly in underserved areas, remain undiagnosed, underscoring a persistent gap in global health equity and the imperative for expanded diagnostic infrastructure.

3. Typical Early Childhood Development: A Baseline

Understanding typical developmental milestones is fundamental for recognizing deviations that may signal a neurodevelopmental difference like ASD. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides comprehensive guidelines for expected development from infancy through preschool.

By 6 months, infants typically engage in social games such as “peek-a-boo” and “pat-a-cake,” wave “bye-bye,” and may begin to call a parent “mama” or “dada.” They start to understand “no,” demonstrating a brief pause or cessation of activity when the word is spoken. In terms of motor and cognitive skills, they can pull themselves to a standing position, walk while holding onto furniture, drink from a cup (with assistance), and pick up small objects using their thumb and pointer finger. They also begin to look for hidden objects.¹³

By 9 months, a crucial social milestone is the emergence of back-and-forth sharing of sounds, smiles, or other facial expressions.¹⁴ This reciprocal interaction is a key indicator of developing social engagement.

By 12 months, toddlers typically show increasing independence, moving away from caregivers but still checking to ensure proximity. They point to show interesting things and extend their hands for washing. They may engage with a few pages in a book alongside an adult and assist with dressing. Language development progresses with attempts to say three or more words beyond “mama” or “dada” and the ability to follow one-step directions without accompanying gestures. Play involves simple interactions with toys, such as pushing a toy car. Motor skills advance to walking without holding on and scribbling. They can drink from a cup without a lid (though occasional spills may occur) and feed themselves with their fingers, attempting to use a spoon. They also climb on and off furniture independently.¹³ At this age, typical development includes babbling and reciprocal gestures such as pointing, showing, reaching, or waving, along with responding to their name.¹⁴

By 18 months, children begin to notice when others are hurt or upset, often pausing or looking sad in response to crying, and they look at a caregiver’s face to gauge reactions in novel situations. They can point to things or pictures when asked. Language expands to saying at least two words together (e.g., “more milk”) and pointing to at least two body parts. They use more gestures beyond simple waving and pointing (e.g., blowing a kiss). Fine motor skills include holding an object in one hand while using the other (e.g., taking a lid off a container). Play involves using more than one toy simultaneously. Gross motor skills include kicking a ball, running, and walking up a few stairs with or without help.¹³

By 24 months, children typically engage in meaningful two-word phrases.¹⁴ This marks a significant leap in expressive language.

By 3 years, children socially engage in parallel play, playing next to other children, and sometimes in cooperative play. They demonstrate new skills by exclaiming, “look at me!” They follow simple routines and possess a vocabulary of approximately 50 words, including two or more words together with an action word (e.g., “doggie run”). They can name objects in a book when pointed to and use pronouns like “I,” “me,” or “we.” Pretend play becomes more imaginative (e.g., feeding a block to a doll). Problem-solving skills emerge, such as standing on a small stool to reach something. They can follow two-step instructions (e.g., “Put the toy down and close the door”) and identify at least one color. Fine motor skills include twisting things like doorknobs, and they can take off some clothes independently. Gross motor skills include jumping off the ground with both feet and eating with a spoon.¹³

By 5 years, children follow rules and take turns in games, and they may sing, dance, or act. They can perform simple chores at home. Language skills include telling a story with at least two events, answering simple questions about stories, maintaining conversations with more than three back-and-forth exchanges, and using or recognizing simple rhymes. Cognitively, they can count to 10, name numbers between 1 and 5, use words about time (e.g., “yesterday,” “tomorrow”), and maintain attention for 5 to 10 minutes during activities (excluding screen time). They can write some letters in their name and identify some letters when pointed to.¹⁵

While explicit developmental milestones are well-documented ¹³, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) highlights that “subtler differences” in gestures, pretend play, and social language often go unnoticed by families and doctors.¹⁶ This suggests that a checklist-based approach alone may be insufficient for early ASD detection, necessitating a deeper, qualitative understanding of social-communicative nuances. The detailed lists of milestones are excellent for basic screening. However, the observation of “subtler differences” implies that even if a child performs a certain action (e.g., pointing), the

intent or context of that action (e.g., pointing to request versus pointing to share interest) might be atypical for ASD, but easily overlooked by a simple checklist. This suggests that effective early detection requires not just observation of what a child does, but how and why they do it, demanding a higher level of observational skill and contextual understanding from parents and professionals.

A crucial observation is the phenomenon of “regression”—the loss of previously acquired skills, particularly in language and social interaction, typically between 15 and 24 months.¹² This represents a distinct and particularly urgent indicator of potential ASD. This is not merely a delay in skill acquisition but a clear deviation from typical development that warrants immediate medical attention. While most milestones focus on the

acquisition of new skills, several sources specifically highlight the loss of previously acquired speech, babbling, or social skills.¹² This is a qualitative difference from a simple developmental delay. A regression implies a deviation from an established developmental trajectory, which is often more alarming and indicative of a significant underlying issue. This specific pattern should trigger immediate and heightened concern, prompting rapid referral for comprehensive evaluation, as it suggests a more pronounced developmental challenge than a child who simply is not meeting milestones.

To provide a clear, age-gated baseline of typical development across key social, communication, and motor domains, Table 1 is presented. This table serves as a fundamental reference for parents and early childhood educators to understand expected developmental trajectories, enabling them to more readily identify significant deviations that might signal a need for further evaluation for ASD. By clearly outlining what is typically expected at specific developmental stages, it provides a crucial comparative baseline. Any significant absence or atypical presentation of these milestones, particularly the “little or no” indicators, can then be recognized as a potential red flag. This structured comparison aids in early detection by making deviations from normative development more apparent and actionable for non-specialists.

Table 1: Key Developmental Milestones (0-24 Months)

Age Range	Social/Emotional Milestones	Communication/Language Milestones	Motor/Play Skills
By 6 months	Few or no big smiles/warm expressions (concern) 14; Limited or no eye contact (concern) 14; Plays “peek-a-boo”.13	Calls parent “mama” or “dada” 13; Understands “no”.13	Pulls to stand 13; Walks, holding on to furniture 13; Drinks from cup without lid (with help) 13; Picks up small items with thumb & pointer finger 13; Looks for hidden things.13
By 9 months	Little or no back-and-forth sharing of sounds/smiles/facial expressions (concern).14
By 12 months	Little or no response to name (concern) 14; Little or no back-and-forth gestures (pointing, showing, waving) (concern) 14; Moves away but checks close by 13; Points to show interesting things 13; Puts hands out for washing 13; Looks at book pages with you 13; Helps with dressing.13	Little or no babbling (concern) 14; Tries to say 3+ words besides “mama”/”dada” 13; Follows 1-step directions without gestures.13	Plays with toys simply (e.g., pushing toy car) 13; Walks without holding on 13; Scribbles 13; Drinks from cup without lid (may spill) 13; Feeds self with fingers 13; Tries to eat with spoon 13; Climbs on/off couch/chair without help.13
By 16 months		Very few or no words (concern).14
By 18 months	Notices when others are hurt/upset 13; Looks at your face to see how to react in new situations.13	Says at least 2 words together (e.g., “more milk”) 13; Points to at least 2 body parts 13; Uses more gestures than just waving/pointing 13; Points at objects to request them vs. share interest (atypical for ASD).16	Holds something in one hand while using other 13; Plays with more than one toy at once 13; Kicks a ball 13; Runs 13; Walks up a few stairs with/without help.13
By 24 months		Very few or no meaningful, two-word phrases (not imitating/repeating) (concern).14

4. Identifying Early Signs of Autism in Young Children

Recognizing the early signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder requires careful observation across several key developmental domains. These signs often present as deviations from typical developmental milestones and can manifest in various ways, ranging from subtle differences to more pronounced atypical behaviors.

4.1. Social Communication and Interaction Deficits

Early indicators in infancy are crucial for timely detection. By 6 months of age, key observations include few or no big smiles, warm expressions, or engaging eye contact.¹⁴ By

9 months, there may be little or no back-and-forth sharing of sounds, smiles, or other facial expressions.¹⁴ A particularly concerning sign by

12 months is little or no response to one’s name when called.¹⁴ Additionally, a child with ASD may appear to ignore a parent’s pointing gesture, failing to look in the direction of the object and then back at the parent to share attention.¹⁶ General signs observed at any age include consistent avoidance of eye contact or inconsistent eye contact, appearing not to look at or listen to people who are talking, and infrequently sharing interest, emotion, or enjoyment of objects or activities.¹ They may not respond to their name or seem to hear at times.¹² There might also be a persistent preference for solitude and difficulty understanding other people’s feelings.¹²

As children progress into toddlerhood, these deficits continue to manifest in various ways. By 12 months, there may be little or no back-and-forth gestures such as pointing, showing, reaching, or waving.¹⁴ Instead of pointing to share interest, a child might take a parent’s hand and lead them to an object without making eye contact.¹⁶ By

18 months, a child with ASD might point at objects only to request them (e.g., to get something), rather than to share interest or enjoyment with a caregiver.¹⁶ Difficulties adjusting behavior to different social situations, struggles with sharing in imaginative play, or challenges in making friends are common.¹ There might be a noticeable lack of pretend play compared to peers.¹⁸ Difficulties with the back-and-forth nature of conversation are also observed.¹

Subtleties in non-verbal communication are also significant indicators. Children with ASD may display facial expressions, movements, and gestures that do not align with what is being said.¹ They might exhibit an unusual tone of voice, which can sound flat, lack emotion, or have atypical tonal variations, sometimes described as a singsong or robot-like speech.¹ Challenges in understanding another person’s point of view or in predicting and interpreting other people’s actions are often present.¹ Difficulty recognizing or reading body language or facial expressions in others is a common social communication deficit.¹² They may use fewer gestures or facial expressions to communicate their needs or emotions.¹⁹

4.2. Restricted, Repetitive Behaviors and Interests

This category encompasses a range of behaviors that are often repetitive, rigid, or unusually intense. Stereotyped movements are common, including repeating certain behaviors or engaging in unusual, stereotyped movements.¹ Examples include hand-flapping, rocking back and forth, or spinning objects.¹² Children might also exhibit uncoordinated or clumsy movements, or unusual patterns like walking on their toes.¹²

A significant sign is adherence to routines and resistance to change. Individuals with ASD often become upset by even slight changes in routine and experience considerable difficulty with transitions.¹ They frequently show a strong preference for strict daily routines and can become distressed when these routines are altered.¹⁹ Tantrums, meltdowns, or withdrawal may signal distress in response to perceived disruptions.¹⁷

Unusual or intense interests and fixations are another hallmark. Children with ASD may develop a lasting and intense interest in specific topics, such as numbers, intricate details, or facts.¹ They might display overly focused interests, for example, with moving objects or specific parts of objects.¹ This can manifest as an unusual intensity or focus on a particular object or activity.¹²

Sensory sensitivities and responses are also frequently observed. Individuals with ASD can be either more or less sensitive than neurotypical individuals to various sensory inputs, including light, sound, clothing textures, or temperature.¹ This can lead to strong reactions, such as covering their ears in response to loud noises or showing aversion to bright lights or certain textures.¹⁷ Overall, they may exhibit unusual and intense reactions to sounds, smells, tastes, textures, lights, and/or colors.¹⁴

4.3. Developmental Delays and Regression

A critical red flag is the loss of previously acquired speech, babbling, or social skills.¹² This phenomenon, known as regression, typically occurs between 15 and 24 months of age.¹⁶ Delayed language development is a common observation.¹⁴ Specifically, very few or no words by 16 months, and very few or no meaningful two-word phrases by 24 months (excluding imitation or repetition), are significant indicators.¹⁴ Children with ASD may also show delays in motor skills, play skills, and cognitive benchmarks.¹⁷ Additionally, an unusual attachment to specific objects can be observed.¹⁷

While symptoms are often categorized into distinct domains (social, repetitive behaviors, delays), many specific signs are deeply interconnected and frequently co-manifest. This highlights that ASD is a holistic neurodevelopmental difference affecting multiple systems, rather than a collection of isolated deficits. For example, “difficulties with the back and forth of conversation” ¹ is listed under communication but is inherently a social interaction deficit. Similarly, “resistance to minor changes in routine” ¹⁴ often leads to “tantrums, meltdowns, and withdrawal” ¹⁷, which are behavioral manifestations of an underlying rigidity. This indicates that the domains are not independent but are different expressions of a core neurodevelopmental difference. Recognizing these interdependencies is crucial for a comprehensive and accurate understanding of ASD, moving beyond a simple checklist to a more integrated clinical picture.

Another important consideration is the challenge of “masking” and gender-specific presentations. The observation that autistic girls may “hide some signs of autism by copying how other children behave and play” and “appear to cope better with social situations” ¹⁸ is a critical factor in potential diagnostic disparities. This suggests that traditional diagnostic criteria, often derived from studies predominantly involving male presentations, may lead to underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis in girls, necessitating more nuanced and gender-aware assessment approaches. If girls are masking their symptoms, their presentation may not fit the “classic” profile often associated with ASD, which could be heavily influenced by male presentations in research. This masking behavior can lead to them being overlooked by screening tools or clinicians who are not specifically trained to recognize these more subtle or internalized presentations. This directly contributes to the observed gender disparity in diagnosis ⁹ and underscores the need for greater awareness and adapted diagnostic practices that are sensitive to diverse presentations.

Furthermore, effective early detection requires moving beyond simply noting the absence of typical behaviors (e.g., “limited eye contact”) to understanding qualitative differences in how children with ASD engage in behaviors. For instance, a child with ASD might point, but their purpose for pointing (e.g., to get an object) differs from a neurotypical child’s (e.g., to share interest).¹⁶ Similarly, words might be present, but their

functional use is atypical (e.g., using words to label but not to ask for things).¹⁶ This signifies that it is not just about whether a behavior is present or absent, but the

quality, context, and social function of the behavior. This demands highly skilled observation and interpretation, moving beyond a simple “yes/no” checklist to a more in-depth assessment of social reciprocity and communicative intent.

To provide a consolidated, age-specific reference of key “red flags” for ASD across the primary developmental domains, Table 2 is presented. This table offers a focused and actionable guide for parents, caregivers, and early childhood educators to identify behaviors that warrant further professional evaluation. By organizing these “red flags” by age and domain, it creates a practical and easily digestible tool for quick reference during developmental surveillance. The clear categorization helps users to distinguish between different types of concerning signs, making it easier to connect observed atypical behaviors to the diagnostic criteria and prompt timely action.

Table 2: Early Warning Signs of ASD by Age and Domain (0-24 Months)

Age Range	Social Communication & Interaction Signs	Restricted, Repetitive Behaviors & Interests	Developmental Delays/Regression
By 6 months	Few or no big smiles/warm expressions 14; Limited or no eye contact.14
By 9 months	Little or no back-and-forth sharing of sounds/smiles/facial expressions.14
By 12 months	Little or no babbling 14; Little or no back-and-forth gestures (pointing, showing, waving) 14; Little or no response to name 14; Appears to ignore parent’s pointing.16
By 16 months			Very few or no words.14
By 24 months	Very few or no meaningful, two-word phrases (not imitating/repeating).14
Any Age	Loss of previously acquired speech/babbling/social skills 12; Avoidance of eye contact 14; Persistent preference for solitude 14; Difficulty understanding others’ feelings 12; Delayed language development 14; Difficulty with back-and-forth conversation 1; Atypical facial expressions/movements/gestures 1; Unusual tone of voice (flat, singsong, robot-like) 1; Difficulty understanding others’ viewpoints/actions 1; Difficulty adjusting behavior to social situations 1; Difficulty sharing in imaginative play/making friends 1; Not wanting to be cuddled/held, preferring to play alone 12; Only initiating conversation for requests/labeling 12; Passive, aggressive, or disruptive interactions 12; Difficulty interpreting facial expressions/body language 12; Fewer gestures/facial expressions to communicate.19	Repeating words/phrases (echolalia) 12; Resistance to minor changes in routine/surroundings 1; Restricted interests 14; Repetitive behaviors (flapping, rocking, spinning) 12; Unusual/intense reactions to sounds, smells, tastes, textures, lights, colors 1; Overly focused interests (e.g., moving objects, parts of objects) 1; Creating specific routines/rituals 12; Uncoordinated/clumsy movements, toe walking 12; Unusual/stiff/exaggerated body language 12; Not mimicking others/participating in make-believe play 12; Fixation on object/activity with unusual intensity 12; Preferring specific foods/textures.12	Loss of previously acquired speech/babbling/social skills (typically 15-24 months) 12; Delays in motor skills, play skills, cognitive benchmarks 17; Unusual attachment to objects.17

5. The Critical Role of Early Detection and Intervention

The importance of early detection and subsequent intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder cannot be overstated, given its profound and lasting impact on a child’s developmental trajectory and overall quality of life.

Timely diagnosis enables prompt access to interventions, which are shown to significantly enhance a child’s communication and social skills.⁴ Children diagnosed before 2.5 years of age often demonstrate notable advancements, particularly in their social skills.⁵ Early intervention programs are specifically designed to target and improve critical areas such as speech and language development, thereby fostering better overall communication abilities.⁵ Intensive early intervention has been linked to significant gains in cognitive ability, communication skills, and social interactions.⁶ Some studies report an average IQ improvement of 17 points ⁴ and even up to 18 points ⁶ in children receiving such interventions. Approximately 65% of children who receive an early diagnosis show notable improvements in their social symptoms, a stark contrast to only 23% of those diagnosed later.⁵

The impact extends significantly to long-term outcomes, independence, and quality of life. Early intervention substantially increases the likelihood of a child with ASD experiencing positive developmental outcomes throughout childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood.⁴ Remarkably, some children who receive early intervention make such substantial progress that their autism symptoms and associated behavioral issues are drastically improved by middle to late childhood.⁴ In some cases, children may even reach a point where they no longer meet the diagnostic criteria for an ASD diagnosis upon reevaluation after two years of intensive intervention.⁶ Early intervention equips children with essential skills, helping them become verbal, learn to advocate for themselves, develop friendships, and acquire greater independence and self-care abilities.⁴ Research indicates that children who benefit from early intervention are more likely to attend regular education classes and achieve higher rates of employment in adulthood, consequently reducing their need for extensive support services later in life.⁴ Furthermore, early intervention can aid children in developing effective coping skills and strategies to better manage their symptoms, which in turn leads to improved socialization and healthier relationships with family and peers.⁴ Beyond the individual, early diagnosis and intervention positively impact families by reducing stress and enhancing the overall quality of life for both the child and the family unit.⁵

The long-term benefits of early intervention, particularly the higher rates of employment and reduced need for support services in adulthood ⁴, present a compelling economic argument for substantial investment in early detection and intervention at a societal and governmental level. Beyond the direct individual benefits to the child and family, these outcomes demonstrate a significant societal return on investment. If early intervention leads to “higher rates of employment in adulthood” and individuals being “less likely to require support services later in life” ⁴, this directly translates into reduced long-term costs for healthcare systems, educational services, and social welfare programs. This reframes early intervention not just as a compassionate healthcare service but as a strategic economic investment that can yield substantial savings and contribute to a more productive workforce, making it a priority for policymakers.

It is critical to note the nuance of “improvement” versus “cure” in ASD. While early intervention can lead to remarkable improvements in symptoms, with some children even reaching a point of no longer meeting diagnostic criteria ⁴, it is explicitly stated that “ASD doesn’t go away”.⁴ This crucial distinction emphasizes that the goal of intervention is to optimize functioning and enhance the quality of life, rather than to “cure” the underlying neurodevelopmental difference. This understanding is vital for managing expectations among families and professionals. This distinction prevents the misconception of a “cure” and instead focuses on the profound impact on functional outcomes and quality of life. Understanding this distinction is essential for setting realistic expectations for families and for guiding research and practice towards supporting individuals to thrive within their unique neurodevelopmental framework, rather than attempting to eliminate their autistic identity.

Effective early intervention typically involves a combination of specialized therapies. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is an evidence-based therapy that systematically applies principles of learning to reinforce positive behaviors, thereby helping children overcome challenges related to communication and social interaction.⁴ ABA uses reinforcement strategies to teach and modify behavior.⁷ The Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) is an innovative and comprehensive early intervention program that integrates principles of applied behavioral analysis with developmental relationship-based strategies. It is ideally initiated as early as 18 months and has demonstrated significant improvements in cognitive ability and language skills.⁵ ESDM typically involves over 15 hours of intensive intervention per week.⁶ Speech Therapy involves tailored interventions specifically designed to improve verbal and non-verbal communication skills, fostering critical language abilities necessary for effective social interactions and self-expression.⁵ Occupational Therapy aims to develop crucial life skills and promote greater independence in daily activities.⁷ It can also address sensory processing issues and fine/gross motor delays.²⁰ Physical Therapy focuses on enhancing gross motor skills and overall physical health and coordination.⁷ Finally, Family Training is a vital component of early intervention, involving engaging parents and caregivers to teach them strategies and techniques they can use to support their child’s development outside of formal therapy sessions.⁴ A multidisciplinary, family-centered approach is widely regarded as the most effective model for autism treatment, ensuring comprehensive and coordinated care.²¹

6. Screening and Diagnostic Process for ASD

The pathway to an Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis in young children typically involves a two-stage process: initial screening followed by a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. This structured approach aims to identify children at risk and then confirm the diagnosis with high accuracy.

6.1. Standardized Screening Tools

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) strongly recommends universal screening for ASD at 18 and 24 months of age, in addition to routine developmental and behavioral surveillance during well-child visits at 9, 18, and 30 months.¹ This recommendation underscores the importance of proactive identification.

One of the most widely utilized screening tools is the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F).¹¹ This ASD-specific questionnaire is designed for toddlers and consists of 23 “yes/no” items completed by parents or caregivers, typically taking about 10 minutes.²² The latest version, M-CHAT-R/F, includes a crucial follow-up interview for cases with positive screens. This follow-up component was specifically developed to reduce the high rate of false positives associated with the questionnaire alone, ensuring more accurate identification and minimizing unnecessary referrals.²² The M-CHAT has been found to accurately identify children on the autism spectrum even before parents or other professionals express concerns.²² The M-CHAT-R/F demonstrates a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 98%.²³

Another standardized screening tool is the Infant Toddler Checklist (ITC). This is a parent questionnaire, forming a sub-part of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales. It is designed to identify children between 6 and 24 months of age who exhibit any type of communication delay, including those indicative of ASD.²² Other standardized screening tools mentioned in the literature include the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT™), the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS).¹¹

It is important to understand the distinction between screening and diagnosis. The M-CHAT-R/F is a screening tool, not a diagnostic instrument, and its high rate of false positives without the crucial follow-up interview ²² highlights the necessity of a multi-stage process. This indicates that a positive screen should prompt further comprehensive evaluation, not an immediate diagnosis, to prevent mislabeling and undue stress for families. The M-CHAT is clearly labeled as a “screening questionnaire” and its “very high rate of false positives” if the follow-up interview is not conducted ²² is a critical distinction often misunderstood by the public. A positive screen indicates

risk and the need for further investigation, not a definitive diagnosis. This understanding is crucial for managing expectations, guiding appropriate clinical pathways, and preventing the emotional and practical burdens that can arise from an inaccurate or premature diagnosis based solely on a screening tool. It reinforces the importance of a multi-faceted diagnostic process.

6.2. Comprehensive Diagnostic Evaluation

Following a positive screening result, a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation is necessary to confirm the presence of ASD. This process primarily relies on the criteria outlined in the DSM-5.² It involves examining persistent deficits in social interaction and communication, and analyzing responses to specific items that cover various developmental domains to formulate a diagnosis.¹¹

Several key diagnostic instruments are utilized by trained professionals:

• Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS/ADOS-2): Considered a gold standard, ADOS is a standardized observational assessment of communication, social interaction, play, and restricted/repetitive behaviors. It is administered by a trained professional or clinician and can be used for individuals from 12 months to adulthood.¹¹ During an ADOS assessment, the specialist directly interacts with the child in structured and unstructured social and play activities, observing verbal and nonverbal communication and looking for hallmark characteristics of ASD.²⁴ The ADOS has a reported sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 75%.²³
• Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R): This is a structured interview conducted with parents or primary caregivers. It focuses on gathering detailed information about a child’s current and past behavior in three main areas: qualities of reciprocal social interaction, communication and language, and restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors.¹¹ The ADI-R has a reported sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 68%.²³
• Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS): This is another screening tool that can also be utilized in the diagnostic process.¹¹ It has a reported sensitivity of 89%.²³

The dynamic nature of ASD diagnostic criteria and tools is noteworthy. The evolution of diagnostic criteria, such as the changes introduced in DSM-5 ², and the ongoing revisions to key diagnostic instruments like ADOS and ADI-R ²³, indicate that the understanding and definition of ASD are not static. This suggests that diagnostic practices must remain flexible, continually updated, and responsive to the latest scientific consensus, which can pose challenges for consistent application and professional training. The explicit mention of “Difficulty in Adapting to Evolving Diagnostic Criteria for ASD” ²⁵ and the revisions to ADI-R and ADOS ²³ highlight that the diagnostic landscape for ASD is dynamic, not fixed. This has significant implications: clinicians must continuously update their knowledge and practices, and diagnostic tools need regular re-validation. This also explains why prevalence rates might appear to shift over time, as changes in criteria can influence who receives a diagnosis. It underscores the ongoing nature of research and the need for adaptive clinical guidelines.

Given the complex and dynamic nature of autism, a multidisciplinary team approach is critical for achieving an accurate diagnosis and developing an effective therapy plan.²¹ A typical multidisciplinary team working with an autistic child may include: Speech-Language Pathologists, Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists, Behavior Therapists (specializing in ABA), Psychologists, Developmental/Behavioral Pediatricians, Neurologists, and Audiologists, in addition to the primary care physician.²¹ Depending on specific medical needs, other specialists such as Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) doctors, Gastroenterologists, Allergists, or Sleep Medicine doctors may also be involved.²¹ An effective team approach necessitates open communication and close collaboration among professionals, rather than independent work.²⁰ This collaboration includes conducting multidisciplinary assessments, holding joint debriefing sessions, regular meetings, co-treating sessions, and consistently sharing clinical experiences and documentation.²¹

Psychologists play a crucial role by measuring a child’s cognitive functioning (IQ), performing assessments for co-occurring conditions such as anxiety and depression, and administering diagnostic assessments for ASD.²⁰ Neuropsychological testing, a component of this, focuses on specific areas of brain function, including attention, memory, problem-solving skills, and language development.²⁰ Speech-language pathologists are often the first professionals to identify concerns, particularly regarding delayed language, which is one of the earliest signs of autism. They can conduct initial evaluations and recommend further comprehensive testing if autism characteristics are noted.²¹ Occupational therapists evaluate a child’s play skills, ability to perform daily life tasks, and sensory processing abilities, and can identify issues like sensory processing difficulties and motor delays.²⁰

The extensive array of specialists involved in a multidisciplinary diagnostic team ²⁰ and the strong emphasis on their “communication and close collaboration” ²¹ highlight that ASD profoundly impacts multiple developmental domains. This indicates that a fragmented or siloed approach to assessment is insufficient for capturing the complexity of ASD and providing a truly comprehensive and accurate diagnosis. The sheer number and diversity of professionals listed in a multidisciplinary team for ASD diagnosis are striking. This is not just about ruling out other conditions; it is about understanding the multifaceted ways ASD manifests across speech, social skills, motor development, and sensory processing. The explicit call for “communication and close collaboration” ²¹ among these specialists underscores that the sum of their individual assessments is far greater when integrated. A holistic, collaborative approach is essential to avoid missing critical aspects of a child’s profile, ensuring a more accurate diagnosis and a more effective, coordinated intervention plan that addresses all relevant developmental areas.

A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation also includes a thorough history of the child’s development.¹¹ Parents are key in providing a detailed history of the child’s behavior and symptoms since birth.²⁴ Direct observation of the child’s interactions and exchanges with parents and with an unfamiliar individual during both unstructured and structured assessment activities is essential for diagnosis.¹¹ Clinicians also utilize interactive play assessments to observe behaviors in a naturalistic setting.²⁰ Parents are encouraged to bring personal notes, videos of their child at home, and documentation from other professionals (e.g., Individualized Education Plans) to the evaluation to provide a holistic picture.²¹

To provide a concise and clear overview of the primary tools utilized in the screening and diagnostic process for ASD in young children, Table 3 is presented. This table aims to demystify the assessment pathway for parents and professionals, outlining the purpose, target age, and key characteristics of each tool. This table is highly valuable because it provides a structured, at-a-glance guide to the often-complex array of assessments involved in ASD diagnosis. It clearly differentiates between screening (identifying potential risk) and diagnosis (confirming the condition), which is a common point of confusion for families. Including information on sensitivity and specificity adds a layer of scientific rigor, allowing readers to understand the reliability and accuracy of each tool. This comprehensive overview empowers parents and professionals to navigate the diagnostic process more effectively.

Table 3: Common ASD Screening and Diagnostic Tools

Tool Name	Type	Purpose/Focus	Target Age Range	Key Features/Considerations	Sensitivity/Specificity
M-CHAT-R/F	Screening	Parent questionnaire for risk identification of ASD	16-30 months	Includes follow-up interview to reduce false positives; can identify before parental concern.22	Sensitivity: 78% 23; Specificity: 98% 23
Infant Toddler Checklist (ITC)	Screening	Parent questionnaire for general communication delays, including ASD	6-24 months	Sub-part of Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales.22	Not specified
DSM-5 Criteria	Diagnostic	Clinical diagnostic criteria for ASD diagnosis	Any age	Based on persistent deficits in social communication/interaction and restricted/repetitive behaviors.11	Not applicable (criteria, not a test)
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS/ADOS-2)	Diagnostic	Standardized observational assessment of social interaction, communication, play, and repetitive behaviors	12 months-adulthood	Gold standard; administered by trained professional through direct interaction.11	Sensitivity: 87% 23; Specificity: 75% 23
Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)	Diagnostic	Structured parent interview for detailed developmental history in social, communication, and repetitive domains	Any age	Focuses on current and past behavior.11	Sensitivity: 77% 23; Specificity: 68% 23
Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)	Screening/Diagnostic	Assesses ASD symptoms severity	Any age	Can be used for screening and diagnosis.11	Sensitivity: 89% 23

7. Challenges in Early Autism Diagnosis

Despite the significant advancements in understanding and identifying Autism Spectrum Disorder, several challenges persist in ensuring timely and accurate diagnoses, particularly for young children. These impediments are often multifaceted, encompassing cultural, socioeconomic, clinical, and systemic factors.

Cultural beliefs and perceptions play a substantial role in how ASD symptoms are recognized and addressed within families and communities. In many communities, various reasons exist for not seeking an autism diagnosis, including the pervasive stigma associated with developmental differences, fear of labeling, or a general mistrust of medical systems.²⁵ Parents may prioritize alternative explanations for atypical behavior, inadvertently leading to missed opportunities for early intervention.²⁵ Cultural norms, such as viewing avoidance of direct eye contact as a sign of politeness in some cultures, can obscure characteristic non-verbal communication difficulties of autism, making symptoms harder to recognize.²⁶ Healthcare providers’ cultural competency is therefore essential, requiring them to understand and respect the cultural considerations that influence families’ experiences with autism. A lack of awareness or implicit bias among healthcare providers can further hinder accurate diagnosis and treatment.²⁵

Socioeconomic disparities significantly contribute to diagnostic delays. Children from lower-income, racial/ethnic minority, and rural backgrounds are more likely to experience delays in receiving an ASD diagnosis.²⁷ This delay is influenced by intertwined sociodemographic factors such as financial and educational resources, as well as language and cultural barriers.²⁷ Poverty rates are typically higher in communities of color, and studies have shown a positive socioeconomic status gradient in ASD prevalence, with higher prevalence reported in areas with higher socioeconomic indicators.²⁷ Discrimination, fear of stigma, and uncertainty regarding the diagnostic process and available services also continue to negatively affect the receipt of early identification for children of color with ASD.²⁷ One study found that Black parents of children with ASD reported significantly fewer autism concerns compared to White parents, which may be due to lower ASD knowledge or differing perceptions of whether specific behaviors are concerning.²⁷ Furthermore, racial and ethnic minorities with ASD have been found to have decreased access to treatment services due to language and logistical barriers (e.g., transportation, childcare, and job accommodations), as well as a lack of knowledge of existing services.²⁷ The financial burdens associated with diagnosis and subsequent services, particularly for children with co-occurring conditions, can deter families from seeking timely and adequate treatment, exacerbating the challenges.²⁵

The presence of co-occurring conditions can significantly complicate and delay an ASD diagnosis. Overlapping symptoms with other developmental disorders like Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or intellectual disability can make it harder for parents and professionals to identify ASD early and accurately.²⁵ For example, ADHD may present as impulsivity or inattention, potentially overshadowing autism traits.²⁵ Similarly, intellectual disability can delay language and social development, further blurring diagnostic boundaries.²⁵ Children with autism have a high prevalence of co-occurring medical conditions, including speech, sleep, and gastrointestinal disorders (such as constipation and feeding difficulties), developmental delay, anxiety, disruptive behavior disorders, hypotonia, and epilepsy.²⁹ The complexity introduced by these co-occurring conditions necessitates a careful and comprehensive diagnostic approach to ensure accurate identification of ASD.

Healthcare system barriers also impede early diagnosis. The prolonged evaluation process can be daunting for families seeking answers, with comprehensive evaluations often taking several weeks to months, especially if multiple specialists are involved.²⁵ Waitlists for diagnostic assessments can further extend this process.²⁵ A significant practical barrier is that autism cannot be diagnosed in a quick office visit; the standard assessment tool, such as the ADOS, takes at least 30 minutes, plus a long interview with parents, making it unfeasible for a typical check-up.²⁸ Clinicians may also hesitate to deliver a lifelong diagnosis of potential impairments without a certain level of certainty, often opting to treat what is treatable first and then reassess, which can lead to delays.²⁸

Finally, global disparities in research and the resulting culturally biased tools present a significant hurdle. Research on autism predominantly focuses on populations from Western, high-income countries, which constitute fewer than 20% of the global population.²⁶ This skewed focus often leads to cultural biases in studies, resulting in culturally inappropriate screening and diagnostic instruments for autism, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.²⁶ In these regions, a significant proportion of individuals with ASD remain undiagnosed primarily due to the absence of culturally appropriate surveillance and screening tools, coupled with a lack of access to evidence-based support or education.²⁶ This disparity highlights the necessity for inclusive research that represents diverse populations and for the development of culturally relevant tools to identify developmental difficulties earlier.²⁶

8. Conclusion

The early identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder in young children is a critical endeavor with profound implications for individual well-being and public health. ASD, a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in social communication and repetitive behaviors, is universally present across all demographic groups. However, significant disparities in diagnosis rates persist, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities and lower-income populations, suggesting systemic biases in access to and recognition within healthcare systems. This calls for a concerted effort to address the “invisible” spectrum and ensure equitable access to diagnostic services.

The benefits of early detection and intervention are well-established and transformative. Initiating therapeutic services during the critical window of heightened neuroplasticity in early childhood can lead to remarkable improvements in communication, cognitive, and social skills, with some children even achieving functional outcomes that reduce or eliminate their need for a formal ASD diagnosis later in life. Beyond individual gains, early intervention presents a compelling economic imperative, as it can lead to higher rates of employment and reduced reliance on support services in adulthood, yielding substantial long-term societal savings. It is crucial to emphasize that while interventions optimize functioning and enhance quality of life, ASD is not “cured,” a distinction vital for managing expectations.

The diagnostic process involves a multi-stage approach, beginning with standardized screening tools like the M-CHAT-R/F, which serve to identify children at risk. A positive screen necessitates a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation by a multidisciplinary team, utilizing gold-standard instruments such as ADOS and ADI-R, alongside detailed developmental history and observation. The dynamic nature of diagnostic criteria and tools, coupled with the multifaceted presentation of ASD across various developmental domains, underscores the essential role of a collaborative, holistic team approach. Such collaboration is vital for capturing the complexity of ASD and avoiding fragmented assessments.

Despite these advancements, significant challenges impede timely diagnosis. Cultural factors, including stigma and differing perceptions of symptoms, can delay families from seeking evaluation. Socioeconomic disparities, exacerbated by financial burdens and limited access to culturally competent providers, disproportionately affect underserved communities. The presence of co-occurring conditions often complicates diagnosis, as overlapping symptoms can mask ASD traits. Furthermore, systemic healthcare barriers, such as prolonged evaluation processes and waitlists, contribute to delays. Finally, the global bias in autism research towards Western, high-income countries results in culturally inappropriate screening and diagnostic tools, perpetuating underdiagnosis in low- and middle-income settings.

To enhance the early identification of ASD in young children, comprehensive strategies are required. These include:

• Increased public and professional awareness campaigns: Tailored to diverse cultural contexts, these campaigns should educate parents, caregivers, and early childhood educators on the subtle as well as overt signs of ASD, emphasizing the importance of qualitative observation beyond simple checklists.
• Expansion of culturally sensitive screening and diagnostic resources: This involves developing and validating tools that are appropriate for diverse populations and ensuring equitable access to these services, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
• Enhanced professional training: Healthcare providers, especially pediatricians, require specialized training to recognize nuanced ASD presentations, particularly in girls, and to confidently navigate the comprehensive diagnostic process.
• Policy support for early intervention: Governments and healthcare systems should prioritize funding and infrastructure for early intervention programs, recognizing their long-term economic and societal benefits.
• Integrated, multidisciplinary care models: Fostering seamless collaboration among various specialists is crucial for accurate diagnosis and the development of holistic, individualized intervention plans.

By addressing these challenges through a concerted and collaborative effort, societies can ensure that more children with ASD receive timely diagnoses and access to interventions, thereby maximizing their developmental potential and enhancing their quality of life.

Works cited

1. Autism Spectrum Disorder – National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/autism-spectrum-disorder
2. Autism spectrum disorder: definition, epidemiology, causes, and clinical evaluation – Hodges, accessed August 2, 2025, https://tp.amegroups.org/article/view/30253/html
3. Early Signs of Autism | Pediatric Health Care Alliance P.A., accessed August 2, 2025, https://pedialliance.com/node/1668
4. Importance of Early Intervention for Kids with Autism – Behavioral Innovations, accessed August 2, 2025, https://behavioral-innovations.com/blog/critical-early-intervention-children-autism-spectrum-disorder/
5. The Impact of Early Diagnosis on Autism Treatment Outcomes, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.mastermindbehavior.com/post/the-impact-of-early-diagnosis-on-autism-treatment-outcomes
6. How Early Intervention Can Improve Long-Term Outcomes for Autism – Yellow Bus ABA, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.yellowbusaba.com/post/how-early-intervention-can-improve-long-term-outcomes-for-autism
7. The benefits of early intervention in autism treatment – Mastermind Behavior Services, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.mastermindbehavior.com/post/the-benefits-of-early-intervention-in-autism-treatment
8. Autism Spectrum Disorder – AAP, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/autism/
9. Global and regional trends in autism burden from 1990 to 2021: A data | RMHP, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.dovepress.com/global-and-regional-trends-in-autism-burden-from-1990-to-2021-a-data-r-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-RMHP
10. Autism statistics and facts | Autism Speaks, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.autismspeaks.org/autism-statistics-asd
11. Autism Spectrum Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment – NCBI, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573609/
12. Autism spectrum disorder – Symptoms and causes – Mayo Clinic, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928
13. CDC Developmental Milestones – Ages 1 through 5 – NJ.gov, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.nj.gov/education/specialed/monitor/docs/CDCMilestones.pdf
14. Signs of autism | Autism Speaks, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.autismspeaks.org/signs-autism
15. Important Milestones: Your Baby By Five Years | CDC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/milestones/milestones-5yr.html
16. 3 Early Signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) – HealthyChildren.org, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/Autism/Pages/Early-Signs-of-Autism-Spectrum-Disorders.aspx
17. Recognizing Early Signs of Autism, accessed August 2, 2025, https://educationonline.ku.edu/community/early-signs-of-autism-spectrum-disorder
18. Signs of autism in children – NHS, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/autism/signs/children/
19. Signs that a child or adult may be autistic, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/topics/diagnosis/before-diagnosis/signs-that-a-child-or-adult-may-be-autistic
20. Assessing Young Children with ASD: A Multidisciplinary Approach – Autism Spectrum News, accessed August 2, 2025, https://autismspectrumnews.org/assessing-young-children-with-asd-a-multidisciplinary-approach/
21. A Multidisciplinary, Family-Centered Approach to Autism – TherapyWorks, accessed August 2, 2025, https://therapyworks.com/blog/autism/multidisciplinary-approach-autism/
22. Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) – CHOP Research Institute, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.research.chop.edu/car-autism-roadmap/modified-checklist-for-autism-in-toddlers-m-chat
23. Screening and diagnostic tools for autism spectrum disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10951453/
24. Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children | NYU Langone Health, accessed August 2, 2025, https://nyulangone.org/conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder-in-children/diagnosis
25. Autism Diagnosis Challenges | Above and Beyond Therapy, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.abtaba.com/blog/challenges-in-autism-diagnosis
26. Addressing Challenges in Autism Diagnosis – Yellow Bus ABA, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.yellowbusaba.com/post/challenges-in-autism-diagnosis
27. Racial, Ethnic, and Sociodemographic Disparities in Diagnosis of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder – PMC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8500365/
28. Why Autism Diagnoses Are Often Delayed – Child Mind Institute, accessed August 2, 2025, https://childmind.org/article/why-autism-diagnoses-are-often-delayed/
29. Identifying Associations Among Co-Occurring Medical Conditions in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders – PubMed, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30053632/
30. Autism medical comorbidities – PMC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085719/
31. Other conditions that affect autistic people – NHS, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/autism/other-conditions/