The Unsung Partner: Systematically Engaging Fathers to Optimize Breastfeeding Outcomes

I. Executive Summary: Paternal Engagement as a High-Impact Strategy

Breastfeeding remains the optimal nutritional cornerstone for infant health and survival, offering profound benefits for both mother and child worldwide. While mothers are central to the act of feeding, the success, duration, and exclusivity of breastfeeding are deeply contingent upon the immediate social environment, particularly the active participation and informed support of the father or male partner.¹ Expert analysis confirms that when fathers are systematically included in breastfeeding education and support services, mothers are significantly more likely to initiate and sustain optimal feeding practices.²

This report establishes that paternal engagement is not a secondary objective but a high-impact public health strategy. Empirical evidence, particularly from intervention studies conducted across Africa, demonstrates that comprehensive paternal support interventions significantly increase Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) rates, showing a Relative Risk (RR) of $1.35$ at three months postpartum.² Moreover, targeted education has been shown to dramatically improve the rate of early initiation of breastfeeding (within the first hour of birth), with adjusted odds ratios approaching five times that of control groups.³

Despite this quantifiable evidence, fathers are routinely overlooked and excluded by health systems and traditional policy frameworks, which tend to focus exclusively on the mother-infant dyad. The primary barriers identified are multi-layered: systemic exclusion by unwelcoming health facilities, the persistence of traditional gender norms limiting men strictly to the ‘financial provider’ role, and high economic pressure that makes clinic attendance an unaffordable opportunity cost.⁴

This report advocates for a paradigm shift, urging policy advisors and health officials to adopt Father-Inclusive Practice (FIP) as a core strategy for Maternal and Child Health (MCH) and Early Childhood Development (ECD). Priority recommendations include immediate organizational commitment to FIP, revising health facility protocols and infrastructure to be couple-friendly, and scaling up successful multi-modal community education models—integrating elements like mobile technology, home visits, and public social recognition—to drive profound and lasting behavioural change.

II. The Strategic Imperative: Reframing Breastfeeding Support as a Shared Responsibility

II.A. Global Health Mandates and Policy Alignment

The international health community has increasingly recognized that enhancing breastfeeding support is a collective responsibility involving families, communities, and healthcare professionals.² This perspective elevates the discussion from an individual maternal choice to a societal investment in public health infrastructure.

Integrating paternal support is crucial for aligning with current global health mandates. The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF’s Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) sets forth the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding. Specifically, Step 3 mandates that facilities providing maternity and newborn services must discuss the importance and management of breastfeeding with pregnant women and their families.⁵ This language represents a critical policy pivot, demanding that healthcare systems proactively structure services to engage partners and family members, rather than merely allowing their passive presence.

Furthermore, the WHO’s Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) serves as a vital policy vehicle for securing high-level political commitment. The NCF, which provides a roadmap for action to help children survive and thrive, explicitly emphasizes men’s role as caregivers alongside mothers, grandparents, and others.⁶ By framing breastfeeding support within the broader context of NCF and Early Childhood Development (ECD), policymakers can argue for resources and political support that extend beyond traditional maternal health budget lines, recognizing that paternal involvement contributes uniquely to children’s cognitive, emotional, social, and behavioural development.⁸

II.B. The Evidence-Base: Mechanisms of Paternal Influence

The influence of fathers on breastfeeding success is profound and multifaceted. Studies show that spousal support is a critical determinant influencing vital decisions, such as whether a woman practices Exclusive Breastfeeding.⁹ The support provided by the male partner moves beyond mere physical presence and manifests through emotional, practical, and financial pathways.

Fathers provide essential support that facilitates the continuation of breastfeeding, especially during times of unexpected challenges.¹⁰ This support encompasses practical assistance, such as taking over household chores, ensuring the mother has adequate nutrition and rest, and providing emotional encouragement and understanding.¹⁰ In a Finnish study, mothers identified fathers as the single most important member of their breastfeeding support team, underscoring the universal significance of this relationship.¹⁰

For the African context, these interventions should be contextualized against existing trends. While data suggests that globally, breastfeeding rates tend to decrease with increasing national wealth, data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) indicates that the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is already highest in regions like East Africa.¹¹ This suggests that interventions in this context should focus not just on initiation, but on maintaining the quality and fidelity of EBF practices, particularly against social pressures. Mothers in African settings often emphasize frequent pressures by relatives, such as mother-in-laws, to abandon their evidence-based infant feeding choices and conform to traditional, often contradictory, culturally normative practices.¹² Paternal education and active support provide a necessary shield against these interpersonal pressures, reinforcing the mother’s choice for exclusivity and duration.

III. Empirical Review: Quantifying the Impact of Father-Inclusive Interventions

III.A. Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Findings

The growing body of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses provides unambiguous evidence supporting the efficacy of paternal support interventions. These interventions have been shown to effectively enhance both the initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding practices.²

A comprehensive meta-analysis indicated that the provision of paternal support interventions significantly increases the rate of exclusive breastfeeding compared to control groups.² Specifically, the rate of EBF was significantly higher in the intervention group within one week postpartum (Relative Risk $1.28$; $95\%$ CI $1.16$, $1.42$), at 30–42 days postpartum (RR $1.12$; $95\%$ CI $1.02$, $1.23$), and critically, at three months postpartum (RR $1.35$; $95\%$ CI $1.21$, $1.50$).²

This consistently positive Relative Risk across multiple time points is pivotal. It demonstrates that paternal support is not merely a transient motivator for early initiation, but a foundational element required for the sustained maintenance of EBF—which is often the most challenging period due to maternal fatigue, perceived low milk supply, and external pressures. The probability of breastfeeding success is shown to more than double when appropriate protective measures and support systems, including paternal support, are implemented.²

III.B. Detailed Case Study Analysis: The Ethiopian Model of Community-Based Education

One of the most compelling regional examples of successful father-inclusive practice comes from a quasi-experimental study conducted in Dessie City, Ethiopia.³ This community-based father education intervention utilized a comprehensive, multi-modal approach spanning the entire perinatal period—antenatal, delivery, and postpartum periods—and achieved exceptional outcomes in both initiation and duration.³

Intervention Components and Fidelity

The intervention relied on trained BSc midwives for core educational content delivery and utilized community health extension workers (CHEWs) for sustained engagement and follow-up, ensuring continuity and localized trust.³

The key delivery methods included:

• Facility and Home Visits: Fathers received education at health facilities or through home visits during all three perinatal periods.³
• Group and Individual Sessions: Monthly group education sessions, lasting 20 to 30 minutes, were conducted, organized by health extension workers based on fathers’ nearest residency.³ Individual sessions were also provided at health centers and during home visits the day following delivery.³
• Digital and Print Media: The intervention leveraged technology by sending approximately 20 individual-based SMS messages promoting breastfeeding. Fathers also received five printed leaflets containing key informational notes at the start of the study.³
• Sustained Follow-up: Three follow-up visits were conducted by CHEWs at the end of the first, fourth, and sixth months to reinforce adherence.³

The curriculum focused on helping fathers gain a better understanding of and motivation for recommended breastfeeding practices, highlighting the importance of early initiation, exclusive breastfeeding, and specific, actionable ways fathers could support their wives during the postpartum period.³

Exceptional Quantitative Outcomes

The success of this multi-modal intervention model was quantified through substantial improvements in key indicators:

Outcome Metric	Intervention Site/Study	Measure	Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) / Relative Risk (RR)	Interpretation
Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) at 3 Months	Meta-Analysis (Multiple Studies)	RR	$1.35$ ($95\%$ CI $1.21$, $1.50$)	Paternal support significantly increases EBF maintenance in the crucial first quarter. 2
Early Initiation (Within 1 Hour)	Dessie City, Ethiopia	AOR	$4.85$ ($95\%$ CI $1.36$—$17.32$)	Mothers were nearly five times more likely to initiate breastfeeding early when fathers received targeted education. 3
EBF at 4 Months	Dessie City, Ethiopia	AOR	$5.47$ ($95%$CI $2.18$—$13.70$)	The strongest measured EBF outcome, indicating sustained behavioral change in early infancy. 3
EBF at 6 Months	Dessie City, Ethiopia	AOR	$1.70$ ($95\%$ CI $1.02$—$2.85$)	A positive effect was maintained through the full recommended six months of EBF.3

The results demonstrate that mothers in the intervention group were found to be nearly five times more likely to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour of life (AOR: $4.85$) and had significantly higher odds of exclusively breastfeeding at one, four, and six months.³

III.C. Paternal Involvement and Extended Benefits

A critical element of the Ethiopian intervention, which speaks to its successful adaptation in a high-context culture, was the use of printed certification for fathers whose infants initiated breastfeeding early and were exclusively breastfed.³ This mechanism goes beyond simple knowledge transfer; it leverages powerful socio-cultural motivators. By providing public recognition (certification), the intervention transformed a private health practice (supporting EBF) into a publicly acknowledged achievement, enhancing the father’s social status and promoting sustained compliance within the community.³ This type of social validation acts as a powerful peer influence and motivator, optimizing the behavior modification strategy.

The benefits of systematic paternal engagement extend far beyond EBF rates. Research highlights that involved fathering—defined as sensitive, warm, supportive, and nurturing—is associated with a wide range of positive developmental outcomes for children, including higher academic achievement, greater school readiness, stronger math and verbal skills, enhanced emotional security, and fewer behavioural problems.¹⁴ Paternal involvement also influences social skills by modeling interactions and encouraging exploration, fostering children’s self-esteem and resilience.⁸ By promoting active involvement in infant feeding, MCH programs inherently contribute to long-term child development, thereby achieving dual policy goals. Furthermore, men themselves report psycho-social benefits from caring involvement, including a more clearly perceived bond with their partners and newborn babies, and a greater respect for their partners.⁴

IV. Diagnosis of Disengagement: Mapping Socio-Ecological Barriers in the African Context

Despite the clear benefits and evidence of fathers’ motivation to be involved, their participation is severely limited by a confluence of systemic, socio-cultural, and economic barriers across the African continent.¹⁶

IV.A. Health System and Facility-Based Exclusion (Structural Barriers)

The most tangible barrier is the institutional exclusion of men by healthcare providers and facilities, leading to pervasive men’s alienation from health services.⁴ Fathers are historically excluded by health professionals who often assume they are uninterested, or who focus exclusively on delivering information to the mother.⁴ This systemic bias limits the information fathers receive about their critical role in supporting breastfeeding.¹⁷

Structural deficiencies within facilities compound this exclusion:

1. Infrastructure Limitations: Many health facilities lack the physical space necessary to accommodate couples, particularly in areas requiring privacy, such as labor wards or Kangaroo Mother Care areas.⁴ Fathers have been frequently prohibited from entering labor wards in studies conducted in countries including Ethiopia, Gambia, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Tanzania.⁴
2. Procedural Hurdles and Time Constraints: In places like Thika and Kiambu Level Five Hospital, Kenya, unfavorable Maternal and Child Health (MCH) setups and excessive time spent at clinics were identified as key barriers.⁴ When fathers do attend Antenatal Care (ANC) services, they often face conditional requirements, such as pressure to take an HIV test, which some participants in Tanzania felt was valued over their actual engagement in their partner’s pregnancy care.⁴ This creates a procedural hurdle that can transform a supportive gesture into a stigmatizing and excessive requirement, discouraging future involvement.

IV.B. Socio-Cultural and Gender Norms (Interpersonal Barriers)

Traditional gender norms across many African countries rigidly define pregnancy, childbirth, and MCH as belonging to the “female domain,” while the man’s domain is strictly defined by resource provision.⁴ This cultural framework creates significant stigma against men who attempt to adopt active, supportive caregiving roles.¹⁶

This financial provider paradigm dominates fathers’ self-perceptions, with limited finances being cited as a primary barrier to involvement, especially where men are the sole income earner.⁴ The literature confirms that modern gender norms and higher education levels are associated with greater male involvement.⁴ However, the lack of generational breastfeeding knowledge and stigma against men being involved with breastfeeding means that paternal knowledge is often low.¹⁸ This knowledge gap severely limits a father’s ability to provide effective support or intervene against detrimental practices.⁸

Furthermore, mothers frequently face intense familial discouragement, with relatives pressuring them to introduce complementary feeds or abandon breastfeeding prematurely.¹² If the father is not sufficiently informed or empowered to advocate for evidence-based feeding, the mother is left without crucial spousal backing to resist these powerful cultural and intergenerational demands.

IV.C. Economic and Structural Impediments

The high economic pressure and the dominance of the financial provider role create a direct conflict with health service engagement.⁴ Involvement in ANC or PNC requires significant time away from employment, which, for low-income fathers, represents a high opportunity cost and a threat to the family’s immediate financial stability. The exclusion of men from health systems, characterized by long waiting times and unwelcoming environments, acts as an economic disincentive. If a father perceives his time investment in the clinic is inefficient or unwelcome, the perceived cost of attendance becomes disproportionately high relative to the perceived benefit, especially when providers prioritize testing over engagement.⁴

Conversely, factors that mitigate financial pressure, such as the existence of two-income households, have been identified as facilitating greater involvement in ANC services.⁴ Policy solutions must therefore either integrate services into the community (reducing the travel/wait time cost) or actively mitigate the economic disincentive of clinic attendance.

Domain	Identified Barriers	Associated Facilitators (African Context)	Source IDs
Health System	Alienation, lack of privacy/space (labor wards, MCH setup), long waiting times, provider bias/assumption of disinterest.	Welcoming facility design, priority access for couples, integrated service delivery (ANC/PNC), provider training, inclusion in high-risk cases.	4
Socio-Cultural	Traditional gender norms (financial provider only), stigma against caregiving, familial/community pressure to introduce complementary feeds early, low paternal knowledge.	Education on breastfeeding benefits, modern gender norms, community experience-sharing groups, public advocacy campaigns (e.g., ‘Super Dads’).	4
Economic	Financial pressures, lost wages/time conflict, sole income earner status.	Two-income households, financial awareness education (cost of care), flexible work policies, integrated community-based services (home visits).	4

V. Evidence-Based Solutions: Successful Models for Father Engagement in Africa

V.A. Adopting the Multi-Modal, Community-Based Intervention

The Ethiopian model demonstrates that successful interventions require fidelity to a multi-modal and longitudinal approach.³ The core success elements for replication include:

1. Actionable Content: The curriculum must focus specifically on actionable support roles, moving beyond abstract benefits to teach fathers how to practically manage household chores, provide emotional support, and navigate common breastfeeding difficulties (e.g., latch issues, cluster feeding periods).³ Fathers reported feeling helpless or disconnected from the breastfeeding process; targeted education mitigates this.¹⁰
2. Diverse Delivery Channels: Relying solely on clinic visits is insufficient. Successful models utilize a combination of monthly group sessions, home visits by community health workers, and consistent use of digital media like the 20 SMS messages used in Dessie City to ensure continuous reinforcement and reach fathers outside of clinical settings.³
3. Community Leadership: Utilizing Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs) for organizing discussion groups and conducting follow-up visits ensures continuity and builds trust.³ Unexpected father’s experience sharing sessions during community health development army meetings (as seen in Ethiopia) successfully leveraged existing local networks to normalize the supportive male role.³

V.B. Integrating Fathers into Antenatal and Postnatal Care (ANC/PNC)

Antenatal care visits represent the most critical entry point for engaging fathers, allowing for knowledge acquisition and intention building before the complexities of childbirth and postpartum recovery begin.¹⁸ Studies in Kenya have shown that providing fathers of newborns with breastfeeding education improves their breastfeeding knowledge, confirming the effectiveness of facility-based training.²⁰

Facility-based FIP must transition from passively allowing fathers to proactively welcoming and incorporating them. This involves:

• Systematic Inclusion: Policies must ensure fathers receive dedicated education alongside mothers during ANC and PNC visits, specifically addressing the paternal role.⁴
• Mitigating Negative Experiences: While involvement leads to bonding, fathers who attend childbirth may report negative experiences such as shame, embarrassment, or helplessness.⁴ Health systems must train staff to address these emotional components, providing preparatory counseling and supportive environments to promote a calm and successful process.⁴

V.C. Shifting Norms Through Advocacy and Media

Changing deeply entrenched traditional gender norms requires a concerted public effort. Public awareness campaigns, particularly those utilizing social media, are crucial for challenging cultural norms that impede breastfeeding support and for encouraging active family participation.²¹

African advocacy campaigns, such as the UNICEF and Government of Malawi’s ‘Super Dads’ campaign, successfully recognize and celebrate fathers’ roles in early development, creating positive modern role models.¹⁹ Furthermore, advocacy must extend to educating the broader family network. Since mothers often experience pressure from relatives to use culturally normative feeding choices, advocacy campaigns should target grandmothers and mother-in-laws, reframing the father’s supportive role as a measure of a successful, modern household.¹² This multi-generational approach ensures that the mother-father dyad has sufficient support from the extended family structure.

VI. Policy and Strategic Recommendations for Systemic Inclusion

To move beyond isolated interventions toward universal FIP, national policies must create a supportive ecosystem by addressing structural, operational, and economic constraints.

VI.A. National Policy and Framework Adaptation (Top-Down Mandate)

Central prioritization and strong leadership engagement are identified as strategic priorities for successfully implementing Father-Inclusive Practice (FIP).²²

1. Mandate FIP: Governments must urgently review MCH policies to ensure the systematic inclusion of fathers in maternal and child health service delivery.²³ This necessitates transforming MCH guidelines to explicitly define and fund FIP.
2. Align with Global Standards: Policies should explicitly incorporate the WHO/UNICEF BFHI mandate to include the family (Step 3) and leverage the Nurturing Care Framework to integrate paternal involvement into long-term ECD strategies.⁵
3. Mandate Professional Training: National curricula for health workers must be revised to ensure staff have sufficient knowledge and competence to support breastfeeding and, crucially, possess the skills for inclusive communication with fathers.⁴ Training must actively counter provider bias and stereotypes that assume fathers are uninterested in MCH.¹⁷
4. Establish Engagement Metrics: Policy must establish ongoing monitoring and data-management systems that track father engagement rates alongside traditional EBF and early initiation metrics to measure the fidelity and effectiveness of FIP implementation.⁵

VI.B. Health Facility Infrastructure and Training (Bottom-Up Operational Change)

Operational changes at the facility level are necessary to dismantle systemic alienation.

1. Infrastructure Revision: Health facilities must allocate physical space that ensures privacy and comfort for couples.⁴ Policies must be revised to promote father involvement in labor and delivery where clinically appropriate and desired, addressing historical prohibitions on entering labor wards.⁴
2. Mitigate Economic Disincentives: To validate the father’s time investment and mitigate the economic burden of clinic attendance, facilities should implement clear procedural rules, such as offering priority and shorter wait times to women who attend ANC visits accompanied by their male partners.⁴ This institutional recognition directly addresses the opportunity cost constraint faced by low-income providers.
3. Focus on Communication and Climate: Health workers must receive targeted training on inclusive communication to build positive, goal-oriented relationships with fathers.²⁴ This shift in clinical culture helps alleviate the reported shame and embarrassment fathers sometimes feel when seeking involvement in typically female-dominated health spaces.⁴

VI.C. Community and Economic Strategies (Socio-Ecological Leverage)

Engagement efforts must be supported by broader societal and economic structures.

1. Workplace Support: Employers, supported by government mandates, should implement breastfeeding-friendly policies, including dedicated lactation rooms and, critically, flexible work schedules and comprehensive paternity leave.²¹ Paternity leave signals institutional support for the father’s caregiving role, validating it as an economic necessity for family well-being.
2. Community Peer Networks: Policy should support the scaling of community-based support groups and experience-sharing networks for fathers.³ These networks normalize modern gender norms and address the information and knowledge gap through peer learning, similar to the successful discussion groups utilized in Ethiopia.³
3. Targeted Educational Resource Development: Resources must be developed and disseminated that communicate directly with fathers about their roles and responsibilities in clear, culturally sensitive language.¹⁸ These materials should promote the central idea that “Breastfeeding is a father’s responsibility,” reflecting successful advocacy themes.²⁶

VII. Conclusion: A Call to Action for Equitable Parental Support

Paternal engagement in breastfeeding support is unequivocally validated by empirical data as a high-yield intervention, demonstrating a capacity to increase exclusive breastfeeding duration by up to $35\%$ at three months and dramatically improve early initiation rates.² For African nations and the international community, the challenge is not proving efficacy but overcoming implementation failure rooted in systemic neglect.

The analysis confirms that motivated fathers often encounter systemic barriers: health facility alienation, traditional gender rigidity that enforces the ‘financial provider’ role, and the resultant economic conflict of taking time off work to access unwelcoming services.⁴

A transformative pathway to optimal MCH outcomes requires robust political will to dismantle these structural barriers. This involves integrating Father-Inclusive Practice (FIP) across all levels—from national MCH policy review and BFHI implementation to practical changes in clinic infrastructure and comprehensive staff training. By leveraging multi-modal, community-based approaches that combine digital technology, home visits, and culturally sensitive social recognition, health systems can empower fathers to be active, informed, and respected partners in the journey of infant feeding, ensuring collective responsibility translates into improved child survival and development.

Works cited

1. How dads can support breastfeeding | UNICEF Europe and Central Asia, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/eca/stories/how-dads-can-support-breastfeeding
2. The role of paternal support in breastfeeding outcomes: a meta-analytic review – PMC, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684246/
3. A community-based father education intervention on breastfeeding …, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11784124/
4. Fathers’ involvement in pregnancy and childbirth in Africa: an …, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11249146/
5. Ten steps to successful breastfeeding – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.who.int/teams/nutrition-and-food-safety/food-and-nutrition-actions-in-health-systems/ten-steps-to-successful-breastfeeding
6. Nurturing care for early childhood development – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.who.int/teams/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-health-and-ageing/child-health/nurturing-care
7. Nurturing care and men’s engagement – Nurturing Care Framework, accessed November 13, 2025, https://nurturing-care.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Nurturing-care-and-mens-engagement.pdf
8. The paternal influence on early childhood development in Africa: implications for child and adolescent mental health – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11622458/
9. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of men in a South African rural community in relation to exclusive breastfeeding – PubMed Central, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8905419/
10. Mothers’ experience of fathers’ support for breast-feeding | Public Health Nutrition, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition/article/mothers-experience-of-fathers-support-for-breastfeeding/A77D152AC7F7E1E1A2102789ACB1682E
11. Fathers’ Narratives and Perspectives on Exclusive Breastfeeding for 6 Months in Kiambu County, Kenya – DukeSpace, accessed November 13, 2025, https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/bitstreams/605ba69c-689c-4be2-9dc2-f52713456e6f/download
12. Male Partners’ Roles in Infant Feeding Practices: Perspectives of Black Mothers Living with HIV in Three Countries – NIH, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9690072/
13. (PDF) A community-based father education intervention on breastfeeding practice in Ethiopia: a quasi-experimental study – ResearchGate, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388530081_A_community-based_father_education_intervention_on_breastfeeding_practice_in_Ethiopia_a_quasi-experimental_study
14. Links between Involved Fathers and Positive Effects on Children – Institute for Research on Poverty, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.irp.wisc.edu/links-between-involved-fathers-and-positive-effects-on-children/
15. Father involvement in early child-rearing and behavioural outcomes in their pre-adolescent children: evidence from the ALSPAC UK birth cohort – PMC – NIH, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5128840/
16. Fathers’ involvement in pregnancy and childbirth in Africa: an integrative systematic review, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16549716.2024.2372906
17. A Qualitative Analysis Of Paternal Perspectives On Breastfeeding Support Among Black Fathers In Connecticut – EliScholar, accessed November 13, 2025, https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2186&context=ysphtdl
18. Black Fathers’ Views on Breastfeeding Facilitators, Barriers, and Support Services: Insights From a Qualitative Community‐Based Participatory Research Study – PMC – NIH, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11956062/
19. U-reporters say fathers have role in breastfeeding – Unicef, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/malawi/press-releases/u-reporters-say-fathers-have-role-breastfeeding
20. Role of Fathers in Promoting Early Childhood Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of the Evidence – Oxford Academic, accessed November 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/40/2/211/7690325
21. Challenges Faced by Breastfeeding Mothers in Kenya and Lessons Learnt – Journals.aua.ke, accessed November 13, 2025, https://journals.aua.ke/ajhes/article/download/432/91/1796
22. Strategic Priorities for Implementation of Father-Inclusive Practice in Mental Health Services for Children and Families: A Delphi Expert Consensus Study – PubMed Central, accessed November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10258177/
23. Effect of a breastfeeding educational programme on fathers’ intention to support exclusive breastfeeding: A quasi-experimental study – African Journal of Reproductive Health, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.ajrh.info/index.php/ajrh/article/view/2391
24. ENGAGING MEN AND DADS AT WIC TOOLKIT, accessed November 13, 2025, https://media.nwica.org/engaging-men-and-dads-at-wic-toolkit.pdf
25. Fathers Supporting Breastfeeding, accessed November 13, 2025, https://wicbreastfeeding.fns.usda.gov/fathers-supporting-breastfeeding
26. Breastfeeding is a father’s responsibility | United Nations, accessed November 13, 2025, https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/breastfeeding-father%E2%80%99s-responsibility-0